PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYQ vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYQ vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYQ achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's 2.79% return.


SPYQ

1D
0.26%
1M
9.36%
YTD
18.82%
6M
18.88%
1Y
51.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDSQ

1D
0.14%
1M
1.42%
YTD
2.79%
6M
4.20%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYQ vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPYQ
Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF
18.82%26.22%4.76%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
2.79%14.22%4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYQ and XDSQ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.94

The correlation between SPYQ and XDSQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYQ vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYQ
SPYQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPYQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYQ vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYQXDSQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

1.59

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

2.18

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.77

+1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.80

8.43

+4.37

SPYQ vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYQ and XDSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYQXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.59

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.69

+0.21

Drawdowns

SPYQ vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYQ drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYQ and XDSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYQXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.88%

-26.06%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.70%

-9.60%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-4.97%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

2.01%

+2.15%

Volatility

SPYQ vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.61%. This indicates that SPYQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYQXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

0.61%

+4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.07%

8.40%

+9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.73%

10.56%

+13.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.64%

15.27%

+19.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.64%

15.11%

+19.53%

SPYQ vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYQ vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

SPYQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SPYQ and XDSQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYQ has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to XDSQ (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYQ dropped -35.88% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.

On 1-year performance, SPYQ leads with 51.99% vs 16.69% for XDSQ. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYQ has performed better with a 51.99% return vs 16.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SPYQ.

SPYQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SPYQ and 0.79% for XDSQ.

SPYQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYQ and XDSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer