SPYQ vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SPYQ (Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYQ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. SPYQ is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, SPYQ returned 51.99% vs 89.50% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. SPYQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

SPYQ vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYQ achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 86.76% return.

SPYQ

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 9.36%
• YTD: 18.82%
• 6M: 18.88%
• 1Y: 51.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -7.65%
• YTD: 86.76%
• 6M: 83.45%
• 1Y: 89.50%
• 3Y*: 27.10%
• 5Y*: 23.77%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYQ vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SPYQ Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF	18.82%	26.22%	4.76%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	86.76%	-5.44%	2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYQ and BNO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024	-0.12

The correlation between SPYQ and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SPYQ vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYQ

SPYQ Risk / Return Rank: 62
SPYQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SPYQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SPYQ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SPYQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SPYQ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYQ vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYQ	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.17	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.68	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.37	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	5.39	-2.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.80	10.23	+2.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPYQ vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYQ and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYQ	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	2.17	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.14	+0.77

Drawdowns

SPYQ vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYQ drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYQ and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYQ	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.88%	-87.06%	+51.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.70%	-17.87%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.04%	+12.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-40.18%	+35.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	9.43%	-5.27%

Volatility

SPYQ vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) is 5.11%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that SPYQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYQ	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.11%	15.03%	-9.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.07%	36.08%	-18.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.73%	41.56%	-17.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.64%	35.37%	-0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.64%	36.68%	-2.04%

SPYQ vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYQ vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

SPYQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%
SPYQ Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF	0.14%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYQ and BNO in my portfolio?

SPYQ and BNO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPYQ or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to SPYQ (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYQ dropped -35.88% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, SPYQ or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 89.50% vs 51.99% for SPYQ. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SPYQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYQ or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 89.50% return vs 51.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYQ or BNO?

BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SPYQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYQ or BNO?

SPYQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between SPYQ and BNO?

SPYQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SPYQ and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.