PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 11.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPYM having a 15.18% annualized return and SWPPX not far ahead at 15.29%.


SPYM

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.29%
6M
8.37%
YTD
10.50%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
20.18%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
15.18%

SWPPX

1D
0.46%
1M
2.04%
6M
9.23%
YTD
11.35%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
15.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.50%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
11.35%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and SWPPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.86

The correlation between SPYM and SWPPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 1.00 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYM vs. SWPPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYM
SWPPX

Technology

39.5%
39.0%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.1%

Communication Services

10.3%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.3%

Industrials

7.5%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.1%

Energy

2.1%
3.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.8%

Technology

SPYM
39.5%
SWPPX
39.0%

Financial Services

SPYM
11.8%
SWPPX
11.1%

Communication Services

SPYM
10.3%
SWPPX
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYM
9.3%
SWPPX
9.9%

Healthcare

SPYM
8.8%
SWPPX
8.3%

Industrials

SPYM
7.5%
SWPPX
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPYM
4.3%
SWPPX
4.5%

Utilities

SPYM
2.3%
SWPPX
2.1%

Energy

SPYM
2.1%
SWPPX
3.1%

Basic Materials

SPYM
1.7%
SWPPX
1.7%

Real Estate

SPYM
1.5%
SWPPX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYMSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.49

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

10.92

-0.30

SPYM vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, roughly equal to the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-55.06%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.89%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-18.74%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-24.51%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-33.80%

-0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-0.31%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-9.92%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.02%

+0.02%

Volatility

SPYM vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

4.28%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

9.98%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

12.55%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

17.03%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

18.21%

-0.21%

SPYM vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPYM and SWPPX have an expense ratio of 0.02%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYM vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than SWPPX's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
1.00%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SPYM and SWPPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWPPX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to SPYM (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer