PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. PMJN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. PMJN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly higher than PMJN's 1.84% return.


SPYM

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%

PMJN

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
1.84%
6M
1.88%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM vs. PMJN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and PMJN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

0.88

The correlation between SPYM and PMJN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. PMJN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PMJN
PMJN Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PMJN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMJN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMJN Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PMJN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMJN Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM vs. PMJN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYMPMJNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.71

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

4.90

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

27.74

-15.76

SPYM vs. PMJN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the PMJN Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and PMJN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. PMJN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than PMJN's maximum drawdown of -1.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and PMJN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMPMJNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-1.15%

-53.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-1.15%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-0.60%

-2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-0.09%

-7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

0.20%

+1.79%

Volatility

SPYM vs. PMJN - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June (PMJN) at 0.88%. This indicates that SPYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMJN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMPMJNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

0.88%

+3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

1.65%

+8.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

1.93%

+10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

1.90%

+15.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

1.90%

+16.13%

SPYM vs. PMJN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PMJN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYM vs. PMJN - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while PMJN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PMJN
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.30%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYM and PMJN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYM has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to PMJN (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs PMJN's -1.15%.

On 1-year performance, SPYM leads with 23.73% vs 5.61% for PMJN. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, PMJN has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 23.73% return vs 5.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMJN.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for PMJN.

SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while PMJN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: State Street and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.50% for PMJN.

PMJN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and PMJN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer