SPYL.L vs. ENGW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPYL.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc) and ENGW.L (SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYL.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500, while ENGW.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPYL.L returned 27.88% vs 47.42% for ENGW.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPYL.L charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ENGW.L.

Performance

SPYL.L vs. ENGW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SPYL.L is traded in USD, while ENGW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ENGW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYL.L achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than ENGW.L's 30.47% return.

SPYL.L

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 4.53%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 6M: 11.11%
• 1Y: 27.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENGW.L

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -1.66%
• YTD: 30.47%
• 6M: 29.00%
• 1Y: 47.42%
• 3Y*: 18.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYL.L vs. ENGW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPYL.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc	10.35%	17.39%	25.33%	14.46%
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF	30.47%	15.28%	1.82%	0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYL.L and ENGW.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023	0.14

The correlation between SPYL.L and ENGW.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SPYL.L vs. ENGW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYL.L

SPYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SPYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
SPYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SPYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SPYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

ENGW.L

ENGW.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ENGW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ENGW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ENGW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ENGW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYL.L vs. ENGW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYL.L	ENGW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.30	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	2.85	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.40	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	3.79	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.52	13.05	+1.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPYL.L vs. ENGW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYL.L and ENGW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYL.L	ENGW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.30	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.91	0.61	+1.30

Drawdowns

SPYL.L vs. ENGW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYL.L drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, smaller than the maximum ENGW.L drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYL.L and ENGW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYL.L	ENGW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.42%	-26.08%	+7.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.13%	-12.46%	+4.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-5.91%	+5.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-5.95%	+4.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	3.62%	-1.72%

Volatility

SPYL.L vs. ENGW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) is 3.12%, while SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that SPYL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYL.L	ENGW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	7.75%	-4.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.61%	17.69%	-9.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.59%	20.55%	-8.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.96%	23.71%	-9.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.96%	23.71%	-9.75%

SPYL.L vs. ENGW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYL.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ENGW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYL.L vs. ENGW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPYL.L nor ENGW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYL.L and ENGW.L in my portfolio?

SPYL.L and ENGW.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPYL.L or ENGW.L?

On fees, SPYL.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYL.L or ENGW.L?

SPYL.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENGW.L.

What is the main difference between SPYL.L and ENGW.L?

SPYL.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ENGW.L is Energy Equities. SPYL.L tracks S&P 500, while ENGW.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPYL.L and 0.30% for ENGW.L.