SPYL.L vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
SPYL.L and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPYL.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Aug 1, 2025. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both SPYL.L and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SPYL.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SPYL.L vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYL.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc | -6.38% | 17.39% | 25.33% | 14.46% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -6.42% | 17.45% | 25.25% | 15.03% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPYL.L having a -6.38% return and CSPX.L slightly lower at -6.42%.
SPYL.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -6.33%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- 17.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSPX.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -6.33%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 6M
- -2.78%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPYL.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYL.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SPYL.L vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPYL.L
CSPX.L
SPYL.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYL.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 1.06 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.55 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 2.37 | +0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.12 | 10.65 | +3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYL.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.06 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.47 | 0.87 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYL.L and CSPX.L is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SPYL.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPYL.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SPYL.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYL.L drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, smaller than the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYL.L and CSPX.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYL.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.42% | -33.90% | +15.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -11.83% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.69% | -7.71% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -3.75% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 1.82% | -0.02% |
Volatility
SPYL.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SPYL.L | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 4.18% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.29% | 8.53% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 15.96% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 15.92% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 16.13% | -2.17% |