PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYL.DE vs. CSNDX.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYL.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYL.DE achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than CSNDX.MI's 20.42% return.


SPYL.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.89%
YTD
11.37%
6M
12.70%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CSNDX.MI

1D
-0.81%
1M
3.91%
YTD
20.42%
6M
22.03%
1Y
39.23%
3Y*
24.49%
5Y*
18.66%
10Y*
21.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYL.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPYL.DE
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)
11.37%4.71%32.33%9.54%
CSNDX.MI
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
20.42%6.74%35.09%11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYL.DE and CSNDX.MI is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023

0.92

The correlation between SPYL.DE and CSNDX.MI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYL.DE vs. CSNDX.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYL.DE
SPYL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CSNDX.MI
CSNDX.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CSNDX.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSNDX.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSNDX.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CSNDX.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSNDX.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYL.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYL.DECSNDX.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

3.79

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

11.18

+1.54

SPYL.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the CSNDX.MI Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYL.DE and CSNDX.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYL.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYL.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.27%, smaller than the maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYL.DE and CSNDX.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYL.DECSNDX.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.27%

-31.19%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-9.95%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.81%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-5.42%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.37%

-1.36%

Volatility

SPYL.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) is 2.66%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that SPYL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSNDX.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYL.DECSNDX.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

4.28%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

10.79%

-3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

15.61%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

19.79%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.60%

19.61%

-5.01%

SPYL.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYL.DE has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CSNDX.MI's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYL.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Dividend Comparison

Neither SPYL.DE nor CSNDX.MI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SPYL.DE and CSNDX.MI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPYL.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.

SPYL.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while CSNDX.MI is Nasdaq-100. SPYL.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while CSNDX.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SPYL.DE and 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYL.DE and CSNDX.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer