SPYGX vs. TAAGX
SPYGX (Spyglass Growth Fund) and TAAGX (Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SPYGX returned 0.14%/yr vs 18.10%/yr for TAAGX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYGX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.61%/yr for TAAGX.
Performance
SPYGX vs. TAAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYGX achieves a -8.61% return, which is significantly lower than TAAGX's 37.12% return.
SPYGX
- 1D
- -3.06%
- 1M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- -8.61%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 5.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- —
TAAGX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 37.12%
- 6M
- 34.03%
- 1Y
- 62.50%
- 3Y*
- 35.56%
- 5Y*
- 18.10%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
SPYGX vs. TAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYGX Spyglass Growth Fund | -8.61% | 15.74% | 38.10% | 54.03% | -47.17% | -11.45% | 61.87% | 34.27% | 7.19% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 37.12% | 16.01% | 36.81% | 26.46% | -25.98% | 17.90% | 36.11% | 27.71% | -14.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYGX and TAAGX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPYGX and TAAGX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYGX vs. TAAGX — Risk / Return Rank
SPYGX
TAAGX
SPYGX vs. TAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spyglass Growth Fund (SPYGX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYGX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.49 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 6.86 | -6.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 27.38 | -26.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYGX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 3.03 | -2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.78 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.28 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
SPYGX vs. TAAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYGX drawdown since its inception was -60.08%, roughly equal to the maximum TAAGX drawdown of -62.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYGX and TAAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYGX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.08% | -62.13% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.05% | -9.26% | -20.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.90% | -29.24% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.90% | -34.47% | -25.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.20% | 0.00% | -12.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -18.69% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.46% | 2.31% | +10.15% |
Volatility
SPYGX vs. TAAGX - Volatility Comparison
Spyglass Growth Fund (SPYGX) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) at 6.86%. This indicates that SPYGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYGX | TAAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.55% | 6.86% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.07% | 16.88% | +4.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.96% | 20.97% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 23.36% | +7.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.27% | 22.30% | +6.97% |
SPYGX vs. TAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TAAGX's 1.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYGX vs. TAAGX - Dividend Comparison
SPYGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYGX Spyglass Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 10.07% | 2.71% | 0.25% | 4.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund | 2.51% | 3.44% | 17.62% | 3.12% | 3.06% | 8.89% | 5.75% | 0.00% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYGX and TAAGX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYGX has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to TAAGX (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYGX dropped -60.08% vs TAAGX's -62.13%.
TAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYGX and TAAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer