PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYD vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYD vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYD achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYD has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 8.76%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.86% annualized return.


SPYD

1D
0.52%
1M
0.07%
YTD
11.52%
6M
11.31%
1Y
17.94%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
8.76%

XLV

1D
0.88%
1M
0.56%
YTD
-2.23%
6M
-2.55%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYD vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
11.52%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-2.23%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYD and XLV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2015

0.56

The correlation between SPYD and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYD vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYD
XLV

Real Estate

26.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

16.0%

-

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Utilities

11.2%

-

Energy

8.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%

-

Healthcare

5.3%
100.0%

Communication Services

4.8%

-

Technology

3.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Industrials

2.3%

-

Real Estate

SPYD
26.5%
XLV

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYD
16.0%
XLV

-

Financial Services

SPYD
11.9%
XLV

-

Utilities

SPYD
11.2%
XLV

-

Energy

SPYD
8.5%
XLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYD
7.3%
XLV

-

Healthcare

SPYD
5.3%
XLV
100.0%

Communication Services

SPYD
4.8%
XLV

-

Technology

SPYD
3.2%
XLV

-

Basic Materials

SPYD
3.0%
XLV

-

Industrials

SPYD
2.3%
XLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYD vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYD vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYDXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

1.51

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

3.56

+3.80

SPYD vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYD and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYD vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYD drawdown since its inception was -46.42%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYD and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYDXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.42%

-39.17%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-10.47%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-17.11%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.25%

-17.11%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.42%

-28.40%

-18.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-5.53%

+2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-7.12%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

4.42%

-1.98%

Volatility

SPYD vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) is 3.59%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that SPYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYDXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

5.14%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

10.58%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

15.06%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

14.76%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.80%

16.59%

+3.21%

SPYD vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYD has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYD vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

SPYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than XLV's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
5.36%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.11%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYD and XLV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLV has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to SPYD (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYD dropped -46.42% vs XLV's -39.17%.

On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.86% vs 8.76% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.86% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLV.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 2.11% for XLV.

SPYD is categorized as S&P 500, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPYD and 0.08% for XLV.

SPYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYD and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer