SPYC vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SPYC (Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPYC returned 12.22% vs 120.64% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. SPYC charges 0.28%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

SPYC vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYC achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.13% return.

SPYC

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 1.04%
• 6M: 5.22%
• YTD: 7.27%
• 1Y: 12.22%
• 3Y*: 16.90%
• 5Y*: 9.09%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 18.08%
• 6M: 14.43%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 1Y: 120.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYC vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPYC Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF	7.27%	21.72%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.13%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYC and WNTR is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.46

Return for Risk

SPYC vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYC

SPYC Risk / Return Rank: 26
SPYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
SPYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
SPYC Omega Ratio Rank: 25
SPYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SPYC Martin Ratio Rank: 26

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 70
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYC vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPYC	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	2.26	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	2.47	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.34	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	2.84	-1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.81	7.31	-4.50

SPYC vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYC and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPYC vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYC drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYC and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYC	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.51%	-42.65%	+14.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.47%	-42.65%	+29.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-10.15%	+8.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-20.53%	+12.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	16.58%	-12.22%

Volatility

SPYC vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) is 5.10%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.84%. This indicates that SPYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYC	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.10%	18.84%	-13.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.84%	47.46%	-36.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	53.83%	-38.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.99%	53.56%	-33.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.62%	53.56%	-33.94%

SPYC vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYC has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYC vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

SPYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than WNTR's 102.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SPYC Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF	0.88%	0.89%	1.02%	1.76%	1.34%	1.01%	0.40%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	102.14%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYC and WNTR in my portfolio?

SPYC and WNTR have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPYC or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to SPYC (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYC dropped -28.51% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, SPYC or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs 12.22% for SPYC. On fees, SPYC is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SPYC has been the lower-risk option at 5.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYC or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYC or WNTR?

SPYC is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYC or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 0.88% for SPYC.

What is the main difference between SPYC and WNTR?

SPYC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SPYC and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.