SPYC vs. FMTM
SPYC (Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPYC returned 16.39% vs 63.62% for FMTM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYC charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.
Performance
SPYC vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYC achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.75% return.
SPYC
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
FMTM
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 34.74%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYC vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPYC Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF | 7.59% | 22.70% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.75% | 27.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYC and FMTM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SPYC and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYC vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
SPYC
FMTM
SPYC vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYC | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.46 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 5.28 | -4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | 20.62 | -16.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYC | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.80 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 2.38 | -1.74 |
Drawdowns
SPYC vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYC drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYC and FMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYC | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.51% | -12.12% | -16.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.47% | -12.12% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | 0.00% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -1.89% | -6.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 3.10% | +1.39% |
Volatility
SPYC vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) is 3.73%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that SPYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYC | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 6.52% | -2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 17.83% | -8.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 22.82% | -7.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 22.94% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 22.94% | -3.29% |
SPYC vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYC has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYC vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
SPYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYC Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF | 0.87% | 0.89% | 1.02% | 1.76% | 1.34% | 1.01% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYC and FMTM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to SPYC (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYC dropped -28.51% vs FMTM's -12.12%.
On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 16.39% for SPYC. On fees, SPYC is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SPYC has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 16.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYC is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.
SPYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.
SPYC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SPYC and 0.45% for FMTM.
FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYC and FMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer