PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYC vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYC vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYC achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.75% return.


SPYC

1D
-0.84%
1M
5.51%
YTD
7.59%
6M
6.63%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*

FMTM

1D
0.50%
1M
6.28%
YTD
31.75%
6M
34.74%
1Y
63.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYC vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYC and FMTM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025

0.68

The correlation between SPYC and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYC vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYC
SPYC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SPYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYC Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYC Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYC vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYCFMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

5.28

-4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

20.62

-16.96

SPYC vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYC Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYC and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYCFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.80

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

2.38

-1.74

Drawdowns

SPYC vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYC drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYC and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYCFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.51%

-12.12%

-16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.47%

-12.12%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

0.00%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-1.89%

-6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

3.10%

+1.39%

Volatility

SPYC vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) is 3.73%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that SPYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYCFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

6.52%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

17.83%

-8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

22.82%

-7.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

22.94%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

22.94%

-3.29%

SPYC vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYC has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYC vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

SPYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYC
Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF
0.87%0.89%1.02%1.76%1.34%1.01%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYC and FMTM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to SPYC (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYC dropped -28.51% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 16.39% for SPYC. On fees, SPYC is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SPYC has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 16.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYC is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.

SPYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.

SPYC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SPYC and 0.45% for FMTM.

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYC and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer