SPYC vs. DGRO
SPYC (Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SPYC is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPYC returned 9.87%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for DGRO. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYC charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
SPYC vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYC achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.
SPYC
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
SPYC vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYC Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF | 7.59% | 15.31% | 22.57% | 23.98% | -25.65% | 29.26% | 9.10% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYC and DGRO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SPYC and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPYC vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYC
DGRO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SPYC
DGRO
Financial Services
SPYC
DGRO
Communication Services
SPYC
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
SPYC
DGRO
Healthcare
SPYC
DGRO
Industrials
SPYC
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
SPYC
DGRO
Energy
SPYC
DGRO
Utilities
SPYC
DGRO
Real Estate
SPYC
DGRO
-
Basic Materials
SPYC
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYC vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
SPYC
DGRO
SPYC vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYC | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.43 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 3.50 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | 13.52 | -9.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYC | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.39 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.77 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.76 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
SPYC vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYC drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYC and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYC | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.51% | -35.10% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.47% | -6.47% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.81% | -14.03% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.51% | -19.31% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.28% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -3.44% | -4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 1.67% | +2.82% |
Volatility
SPYC vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that SPYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYC | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 2.21% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 6.91% | +2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 9.48% | +5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 13.82% | +6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 16.62% | +3.03% |
SPYC vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYC has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYC vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
SPYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
SPYC Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF | 0.87% | 0.89% | 1.02% | 1.76% | 1.34% | 1.01% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYC and DGRO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYC has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYC dropped -28.51% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.54% vs 9.87% for SPYC. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SPYC.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.87% for SPYC.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SPYC and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYC and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer