SPYA vs. QQHG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPYA (Twin Oak Endure ETF) and QQHG (Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPYA returned 20.03% vs 26.49% for QQHG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYA charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQHG.

Performance

SPYA vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYA achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's 10.80% return.

SPYA

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 4.56%
• YTD: 8.43%
• 6M: 8.12%
• 1Y: 20.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQHG

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 10.80%
• 6M: 10.03%
• 1Y: 26.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYA vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPYA Twin Oak Endure ETF	8.43%	11.69%
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	10.80%	13.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYA and QQHG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	0.85

The correlation between SPYA and QQHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SPYA vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYA

SPYA Risk / Return Rank: 51
SPYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SPYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SPYA Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SPYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
SPYA Martin Ratio Rank: 50

QQHG

QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 85
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYA vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYA	QQHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.83	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	3.93	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.51	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	4.30	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	17.10	-8.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPYA vs. QQHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the QQHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYA and QQHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYA	QQHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	2.83	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.90	3.26	-1.36

Drawdowns

SPYA vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYA drawdown since its inception was -9.51%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYA and QQHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYA	QQHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.51%	-6.18%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	-6.18%	-3.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.82%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.44%	-0.97%	-0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	1.55%	+0.86%

Volatility

SPYA vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison

Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) at 2.20%. This indicates that SPYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYA	QQHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	2.20%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	6.69%	+1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.13%	9.43%	+1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.13%	9.54%	+1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.13%	9.54%	+1.59%

SPYA vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYA vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison

SPYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than QQHG's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	0.20%	0.17%
SPYA Twin Oak Endure ETF	0.35%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYA and QQHG in my portfolio?

SPYA and QQHG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPYA or QQHG?

SPYA has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to QQHG (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYA dropped -9.51% vs QQHG's -6.18%.

Which ETF is better, SPYA or QQHG?

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 26.49% vs 20.03% for SPYA. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, QQHG has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYA or QQHG?

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 26.49% return vs 20.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYA or QQHG?

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SPYA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYA or QQHG?

SPYA has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.

What is the main difference between SPYA and QQHG?

They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SPYA and 0.45% for QQHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.