SPY vs. XLV
SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPY returned 15.49%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for XLV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPY charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
SPY vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPY achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -4.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SPY has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 15.49%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
XLV
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- -4.29%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- 12.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
SPY vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -4.29% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPY and XLV is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPY and XLV has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPY vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPY
XLV
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPY
XLV
-
Financial Services
SPY
XLV
-
Communication Services
SPY
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPY
XLV
-
Healthcare
SPY
XLV
Industrials
SPY
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
SPY
XLV
-
Energy
SPY
XLV
-
Utilities
SPY
XLV
-
Real Estate
SPY
XLV
-
Basic Materials
SPY
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPY vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
SPY
XLV
SPY vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPY | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.16 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 1.24 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.72 | 2.99 | +11.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPY | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 0.88 | +1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.38 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.56 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.46 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
SPY vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPY drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPY | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.19% | -39.17% | -16.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -10.47% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | -17.11% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.50% | -17.11% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | -28.40% | -5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -7.52% | +6.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.05% | -7.12% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 4.32% | -2.41% |
Volatility
SPY vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) is 2.84%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that SPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPY | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 4.10% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 10.24% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.83% | 14.67% | -2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 14.69% | +2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 16.55% | +1.39% |
SPY vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPY has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPY vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than XLV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.70% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPY and XLV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPY dropped -55.19% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 9.20% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPY.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.
SPY is categorized as S&P 500, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. SPY tracks S&P 500 Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY and 0.08% for XLV.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPY and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer