SPXU vs. TQQQ
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXU is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%), while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXU returned -41.20%/yr vs 41.62%/yr for TQQQ. At a correlation of -0.90, they often move in opposite directions. SPXU charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
SPXU vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -25.00% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 34.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXU has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -41.20%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 41.62% annualized return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- -21.86%
- YTD
- -25.00%
- 1Y
- -41.21%
- 3Y*
- -39.91%
- 5Y*
- -33.74%
- 10Y*
- -41.20%
TQQQ
- 1D
- -4.97%
- 1M
- -11.29%
- 6M
- 30.60%
- YTD
- 34.71%
- 1Y
- 67.39%
- 3Y*
- 47.91%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- 41.62%
SPXU vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -25.00% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 34.71% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and TQQQ is -0.93, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.90 |
The correlation between SPXU and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXU vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXU
TQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SPXU
TQQQ
Basic Materials
SPXU
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
SPXU
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SPXU
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
SPXU
-
TQQQ
Energy
SPXU
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
SPXU
-
TQQQ
Industrials
SPXU
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
SPXU
-
TQQQ
Technology
SPXU
-
TQQQ
Utilities
SPXU
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
TQQQ
SPXU vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXU | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.22 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 1.83 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | 5.57 | -7.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -81.66% | -18.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.83% | -36.97% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | -58.04% | -26.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -81.66% | -8.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.56% | -81.66% | -17.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -18.71% | -81.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.36% | -18.48% | -74.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.60% | 12.14% | +13.46% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) is 10.37%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 22.28%. This indicates that SPXU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 22.28% | -11.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.00% | 46.14% | -16.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.51% | 55.54% | -18.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.67% | 67.78% | -17.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.33% | 66.40% | -13.07% |
SPXU vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than TQQQ's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 6.92% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.53% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (22.28%) compared to SPXU (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 41.62% vs -41.20% for SPXU. On fees, SPXU is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SPXU has been the lower-risk option at 10.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 41.62% return vs -41.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXU is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 0.53% for TQQQ.
SPXU is categorized as S&P 500, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SPXU and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer