SPXU vs. SPMO
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXU is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%), while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXU returned -41.98%/yr vs 21.03%/yr for SPMO. At a correlation of -0.78, they often move in opposite directions. SPXU charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
SPXU vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -20.19% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXU has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of -41.98%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- -20.19%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -43.92%
- 3Y*
- -40.85%
- 5Y*
- -33.55%
- 10Y*
- -41.98%
SPMO
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 29.91%
- 6M
- 28.13%
- 1Y
- 43.55%
- 3Y*
- 42.47%
- 5Y*
- 22.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
SPXU vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -20.19% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 29.91% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and SPMO is -0.85, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | -0.78 |
The correlation between SPXU and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.86 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXU vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXU
SPMO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SPXU
SPMO
Basic Materials
SPXU
-
SPMO
Communication Services
SPXU
-
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
SPXU
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
SPXU
-
SPMO
Energy
SPXU
-
SPMO
Healthcare
SPXU
-
SPMO
Industrials
SPXU
-
SPMO
Real Estate
SPXU
-
SPMO
Technology
SPXU
-
SPMO
Utilities
SPXU
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
SPMO
SPXU vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXU | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.39 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 3.45 | -4.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | 12.97 | -14.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -30.95% | -69.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.11% | -12.70% | -34.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | -20.13% | -64.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -22.74% | -67.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | -30.95% | -68.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -4.53% | -95.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.33% | -4.59% | -88.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.37% | 3.37% | +26.00% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 11.75%. This indicates that SPXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 11.75% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 17.78% | +11.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 20.55% | +16.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 19.88% | +30.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.43% | 20.60% | +32.83% |
SPXU vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than SPMO's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.68% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.35% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU and SPMO have a correlation of -0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXU has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to SPMO (11.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.03% vs -41.98% for SPXU. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 11.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.03% return vs -41.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPXU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 0.68% for SPMO.
SPXU is categorized as S&P 500, while SPMO is Momentum. SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%), while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SPXU and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer