SPXU vs. MUU
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SPXU is passively managed, while MUU is actively managed. Over the past year, SPXU returned -48.96% vs 6522.95% for MUU. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. SPXU charges 0.93%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.
Performance
SPXU vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -25.62% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -13.20%
- YTD
- -25.62%
- 6M
- -25.04%
- 1Y
- -48.96%
- 3Y*
- -43.02%
- 5Y*
- -34.89%
- 10Y*
- -41.95%
MUU
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 218.90%
- YTD
- 961.23%
- 6M
- 1,422.01%
- 1Y
- 6,522.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXU vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -25.62% | -41.73% | -4.06% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 961.23% | 599.03% | -43.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and MUU is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | -0.54 |
The correlation between SPXU and MUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.54 to -0.47 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
MUU
SPXU vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -51.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.91 | -1.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 125.85 | -126.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | 426.84 | -428.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.39 | 50.40 | -51.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.84 | 6.68 | -7.52 |
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -75.07% | -24.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.82% | -52.72% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | 0.00% | -99.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.33% | -23.44% | -69.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.06% | 15.51% | +14.55% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) is 8.58%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that SPXU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 54.78% | -46.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.85% | 105.07% | -78.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.37% | 131.77% | -96.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.33% | 133.67% | -83.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.38% | 133.67% | -80.29% |
SPXU vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than MUU's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.46% | 4.27% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.89% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU and MUU have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to SPXU (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs MUU's -75.07%.
On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs -48.96% for SPXU. On fees, SPXU is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, SPXU has been the lower-risk option at 8.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs -48.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXU is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 0.46% for MUU.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.93% for SPXU and 1.06% for MUU.
MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer