SPXU vs. COIG
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SPXU is passively managed, while COIG is actively managed. Over the past year, SPXU returned -48.96% vs -79.30% for COIG. At a correlation of -0.60, they often move in opposite directions. SPXU charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COIG.
Performance
SPXU vs. COIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -25.62% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -61.85% return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -13.20%
- YTD
- -25.62%
- 6M
- -25.04%
- 1Y
- -48.96%
- 3Y*
- -43.02%
- 5Y*
- -34.89%
- 10Y*
- -41.95%
COIG
- 1D
- -11.21%
- 1M
- -37.91%
- YTD
- -61.85%
- 6M
- -75.19%
- 1Y
- -79.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXU vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -25.62% | -48.62% |
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | -61.85% | -9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and COIG is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025 | -0.60 |
The correlation between SPXU and COIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
COIG
SPXU vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 0.93 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.86 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | -1.20 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.39 | -0.57 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.84 | -0.40 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than COIG's maximum drawdown of -92.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and COIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -92.06% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.82% | -92.06% | +41.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -91.42% | -8.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.33% | -51.70% | -41.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.06% | 65.88% | -35.82% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) is 8.58%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a volatility of 37.85%. This indicates that SPXU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 37.85% | -29.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.85% | 100.21% | -73.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.37% | 139.35% | -103.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.33% | 146.45% | -96.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.38% | 146.45% | -93.07% |
SPXU vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, while COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.89% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU and COIG have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIG has higher volatility (37.85%) compared to SPXU (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs COIG's -92.06%.
On 1-year performance, SPXU leads with -48.96% vs -79.30% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SPXU has been the lower-risk option at 8.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPXU has performed better with a -48.96% return vs -79.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for SPXU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.93% for SPXU and 0.75% for COIG.
COIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and COIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer