SPXT vs. SMH
SPXT (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXT is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Information Technology Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXT returned 11.43%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
SPXT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXT achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXT has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 11.43%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
SPXT
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
SPXT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXT ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF | 4.27% | 15.10% | 19.93% | 16.23% | -14.24% | 26.36% | 10.44% | 26.88% | -7.06% | 16.99% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXT and SMH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SPXT and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPXT vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXT
SMH
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Financial Services
SPXT
SMH
-
Communication Services
SPXT
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPXT
SMH
-
Healthcare
SPXT
SMH
-
Industrials
SPXT
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
SPXT
SMH
-
Energy
SPXT
SMH
-
Utilities
SPXT
SMH
-
Real Estate
SPXT
SMH
-
Basic Materials
SPXT
SMH
-
Technology
SPXT
SMH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
SPXT
SMH
SPXT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.60 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 9.18 | -7.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | 33.74 | -25.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXT vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXT drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXT and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -84.96% | +50.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -14.93% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -35.74% | +20.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.47% | -45.30% | +23.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.38% | -45.30% | +10.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -2.81% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -41.04% | +36.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 4.06% | -2.23% |
Volatility
SPXT vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) is 3.19%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that SPXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 16.25% | -13.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 27.73% | -19.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 33.20% | -22.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 35.47% | -20.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 32.82% | -16.58% |
SPXT vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
SPXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
SPXT ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.29% | 1.53% | 1.86% | 1.15% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.55% | 2.67% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXT and SMH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to SPXT (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXT dropped -34.38% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 11.43% for SPXT. On fees, SPXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
SPXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
SPXT is categorized as S&P 500, while SMH is Semiconductors. SPXT tracks S&P 500 Ex-Information Technology Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXT and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXT and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer