PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXP.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXP.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPXP.L is traded in GBp, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXP.L achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L has underperformed TDGB.L with an annualized return of -26.88%, while TDGB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.


SPXP.L

1D
0.80%
1M
1.16%
YTD
10.63%
6M
10.85%
1Y
-98.72%
3Y*
-74.23%
5Y*
-54.45%
10Y*
-26.88%

TDGB.L

1D
-0.31%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
8.93%
6M
9.63%
1Y
28.91%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXP.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.63%-98.90%27.58%20.06%-8.79%31.26%13.90%26.76%0.26%10.77%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.93%30.90%10.66%9.04%22.49%19.59%-5.61%3.88%-7.98%2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXP.L and TDGB.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between SPXP.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPXP.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXP.L
TDGB.L

Technology

39.0%
0.3%

Financial Services

11.1%
31.9%

Communication Services

10.6%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
3.8%

Healthcare

8.3%
14.4%

Industrials

7.8%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
10.0%

Energy

3.1%
19.7%

Utilities

2.1%
6.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.2%

Technology

SPXP.L
39.0%
TDGB.L
0.3%

Financial Services

SPXP.L
11.1%
TDGB.L
31.9%

Communication Services

SPXP.L
10.6%
TDGB.L
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXP.L
9.9%
TDGB.L
3.8%

Healthcare

SPXP.L
8.3%
TDGB.L
14.4%

Industrials

SPXP.L
7.8%
TDGB.L
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPXP.L
4.5%
TDGB.L
10.0%

Energy

SPXP.L
3.1%
TDGB.L
19.7%

Utilities

SPXP.L
2.1%
TDGB.L
6.2%

Real Estate

SPXP.L
1.8%
TDGB.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

SPXP.L
1.7%
TDGB.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXP.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXP.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXP.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.52

1.58

-1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

6.17

-7.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.29

20.41

-21.70

SPXP.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXP.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXP.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than TDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -32.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXP.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-32.94%

-66.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.07%

-4.66%

-94.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.07%

-12.42%

-86.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.07%

-12.42%

-86.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

-32.94%

-66.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.91%

-1.46%

-97.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-4.91%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

76.64%

1.41%

+75.23%

Volatility

SPXP.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.13%. This indicates that SPXP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXP.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

2.13%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

7.04%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.31%

9.30%

+90.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.55%

11.43%

+35.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.91%

13.69%

+21.22%

SPXP.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXP.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

SPXP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.20%3.50%4.26%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%4.38%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXP.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

SPXP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXP.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer