SPXP.L vs. SXLI.L
SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and SXLI.L (SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SXLI.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L returned 16.32%/yr vs 14.68%/yr for SXLI.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXP.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SXLI.L.
Performance
SPXP.L vs. SXLI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPXP.L is traded in GBp, while SXLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SXLI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXP.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than SXLI.L's 13.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L has outperformed SXLI.L with an annualized return of 16.32%, while SXLI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.68% annualized return.
SPXP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
SXLI.L
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 13.10%
- 6M
- 14.48%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
SPXP.L vs. SXLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
SXLI.L SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF | 13.10% | 10.72% | 19.47% | 12.05% | 5.93% | 21.83% | 6.89% | 23.71% | -8.91% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXP.L and SXLI.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SPXP.L and SXLI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPXP.L vs. SXLI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
Financial Services
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
-
Communication Services
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
Healthcare
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
-
Industrials
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
Consumer Defensive
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
-
Energy
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
-
Utilities
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
Real Estate
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
-
Basic Materials
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXP.L vs. SXLI.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPXP.L
SXLI.L
SPXP.L vs. SXLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXP.L | SXLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.29 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 2.76 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 8.53 | +6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXP.L | SXLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 1.69 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.79 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | 0.77 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.76 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
SPXP.L vs. SXLI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, smaller than the maximum SXLI.L drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and SXLI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXP.L | SXLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -35.05% | +9.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -8.94% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -20.84% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -20.84% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.46% | -35.05% | +9.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.93% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -4.20% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.90% | -0.97% |
Volatility
SPXP.L vs. SXLI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) is 2.64%, while SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLI.L) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that SPXP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXP.L | SXLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 5.17% | -2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 11.62% | -4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 14.61% | -4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 16.91% | -2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 19.04% | -2.82% |
SPXP.L vs. SXLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SXLI.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXP.L vs. SXLI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPXP.L nor SXLI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXP.L and SXLI.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLI.L.
SPXP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while SXLI.L is Industrials Equities. SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while SXLI.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXP.L and 0.15% for SXLI.L.
Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and SXLI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer