SPXP.L vs. SPYL.L
SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and SPYL.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - SPXP.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while SPYL.L tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPXP.L returned 29.27% vs 29.22% for SPYL.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXP.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPYL.L.
Performance
SPXP.L vs. SPYL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPXP.L is traded in GBp, while SPYL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPXP.L having a 10.55% return and SPYL.L slightly higher at 10.73%.
SPXP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
SPYL.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 29.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXP.L vs. SPYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 9.61% |
SPYL.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.73% | 9.03% | 27.52% | 9.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXP.L and SPYL.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SPXP.L and SPYL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXP.L vs. SPYL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Financial Services
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Communication Services
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Healthcare
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Industrials
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Consumer Defensive
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Energy
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Utilities
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Real Estate
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Basic Materials
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXP.L vs. SPYL.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPXP.L
SPYL.L
SPXP.L vs. SPYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXP.L | SPYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.45 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 3.98 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 13.59 | +1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXP.L | SPYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 2.43 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.55 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
SPXP.L vs. SPYL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, which is greater than SPYL.L's maximum drawdown of -21.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and SPYL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXP.L | SPYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -21.16% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -7.21% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.28% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -2.95% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.13% | -0.20% |
Volatility
SPXP.L vs. SPYL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) is 2.64%, while SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that SPXP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXP.L | SPYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 3.53% | -0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 8.62% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 11.87% | -1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 14.14% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 14.14% | +2.08% |
SPXP.L vs. SPYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXP.L vs. SPYL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPXP.L nor SPYL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SPXP.L and SPYL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPYL.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYL.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SPXP.L.
SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPYL.L tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXP.L and 0.03% for SPYL.L.
Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and SPYL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer