PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXN vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXN vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPXN having a 16.26% annualized return and IVV not far behind at 15.54%.


SPXN

1D
-0.59%
1M
6.16%
YTD
13.57%
6M
13.21%
1Y
32.98%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*
16.26%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXN vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
13.57%18.74%24.35%28.57%-18.87%27.04%22.15%31.50%-3.85%20.84%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXN and IVV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

0.83

The correlation between SPXN and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.98 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXN vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXN
IVV

Technology

41.1%
35.6%

Communication Services

13.1%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.9%
8.5%

Industrials

9.6%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
4.9%

Energy

4.1%
3.5%

Utilities

2.7%
2.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.8%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

SPXN
41.1%
IVV
35.6%

Communication Services

SPXN
13.1%
IVV
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXN
11.8%
IVV
10.1%

Healthcare

SPXN
9.9%
IVV
8.5%

Industrials

SPXN
9.6%
IVV
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPXN
5.7%
IVV
4.9%

Energy

SPXN
4.1%
IVV
3.5%

Utilities

SPXN
2.7%
IVV
2.4%

Basic Materials

SPXN
2.1%
IVV
1.8%

Financial Services

SPXN

-

IVV
11.8%

Real Estate

SPXN

-

IVV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXN vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXN
SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXN vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXNIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

3.17

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.43

14.71

+1.72

SPXN vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXN and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXNIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.39

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.83

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.86

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.45

+0.47

Drawdowns

SPXN vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXNIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.10%

-55.25%

+23.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-8.89%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-18.75%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

-24.53%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.10%

-33.90%

+1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.76%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-10.78%

+6.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.91%

+0.10%

Volatility

SPXN vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that SPXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXNIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

2.87%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

8.90%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

11.80%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

16.88%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

18.05%

-0.41%

SPXN vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXN vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
0.87%0.98%1.12%1.19%1.35%0.94%1.09%1.41%1.76%1.54%2.60%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SPXN and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPXN has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, SPXN leads with 16.26% vs 15.54% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 16.26% return vs 15.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPXN.

IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.87% for SPXN.

SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 0.03% for IVV.

SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXN and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer