SPXN vs. IVV
SPXN (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPXN tracks the S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index while IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXN returned 16.26%/yr vs 15.54%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXN charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
SPXN vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPXN having a 16.26% annualized return and IVV not far behind at 15.54%.
SPXN
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 6M
- 13.21%
- 1Y
- 32.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
IVV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
SPXN vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 13.57% | 18.74% | 24.35% | 28.57% | -18.87% | 27.04% | 22.15% | 31.50% | -3.85% | 20.84% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.85% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXN and IVV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SPXN and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.98 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPXN vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXN
IVV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPXN
IVV
Communication Services
SPXN
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
SPXN
IVV
Healthcare
SPXN
IVV
Industrials
SPXN
IVV
Consumer Defensive
SPXN
IVV
Energy
SPXN
IVV
Utilities
SPXN
IVV
Basic Materials
SPXN
IVV
Financial Services
SPXN
-
IVV
Real Estate
SPXN
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXN vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
SPXN
IVV
SPXN vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXN | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.43 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 3.17 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.43 | 14.71 | +1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXN | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 2.39 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.83 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 0.86 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.45 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
SPXN vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXN | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -55.25% | +23.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.26% | -8.89% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.56% | -18.75% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.47% | -24.53% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.10% | -33.90% | +1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.76% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -10.78% | +6.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.91% | +0.10% |
Volatility
SPXN vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that SPXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXN | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 2.87% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 8.90% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.70% | 11.80% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 16.88% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 18.05% | -0.41% |
SPXN vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXN vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than IVV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.76% | 1.54% | 2.60% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SPXN and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPXN has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, SPXN leads with 16.26% vs 15.54% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 16.26% return vs 15.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPXN.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.87% for SPXN.
SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 0.03% for IVV.
SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXN and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer