SPXL vs. IGM
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXL returned 29.92%/yr vs 24.72%/yr for IGM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGM.
Performance
SPXL vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 23.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXL has outperformed IGM with an annualized return of 29.92%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively lower 24.72% annualized return.
SPXL
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 20.38%
- 6M
- 26.72%
- 1Y
- 70.31%
- 3Y*
- 45.50%
- 5Y*
- 23.10%
- 10Y*
- 29.92%
IGM
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 23.93%
- 6M
- 27.90%
- 1Y
- 49.62%
- 3Y*
- 35.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.05%
- 10Y*
- 24.72%
SPXL vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 20.38% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 23.93% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and IGM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2008 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SPXL and IGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXL vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXL
IGM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPXL
IGM
Financial Services
SPXL
IGM
Communication Services
SPXL
IGM
Consumer Cyclical
SPXL
IGM
Healthcare
SPXL
IGM
-
Industrials
SPXL
IGM
Consumer Defensive
SPXL
IGM
-
Energy
SPXL
IGM
Utilities
SPXL
IGM
-
Real Estate
SPXL
IGM
-
Basic Materials
SPXL
IGM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
IGM
SPXL vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXL | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.37 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.03 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 10.21 | +0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than IGM's maximum drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -65.59% | -11.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -16.44% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | -26.39% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | -40.68% | -23.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | -40.68% | -36.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -6.42% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.10% | -15.21% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 4.88% | +1.62% |
Volatility
SPXL vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) has a higher volatility of 14.13% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 10.71%. This indicates that SPXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.13% | 10.71% | +3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.34% | 18.29% | +11.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.14% | 22.31% | +14.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.54% | 25.98% | +24.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.55% | 24.70% | +28.85% |
SPXL vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than IGM's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.56% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXL and IGM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXL has higher volatility (14.13%) compared to IGM (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs IGM's -65.59%.
On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 29.92% vs 24.72% for IGM. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 10.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 29.92% return vs 24.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.14% for IGM.
SPXL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IGM is Technology Equities. SPXL tracks S&P 500, while IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.39% for IGM.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer