SPXJ.L vs. INAA.AS
SPXJ.L (iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)) and INAA.AS (iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXJ.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while INAA.AS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXJ.L returned 8.40%/yr vs 15.35%/yr for INAA.AS. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXJ.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for INAA.AS.
Performance
SPXJ.L vs. INAA.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPXJ.L is traded in GBp, while INAA.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the INAA.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXJ.L achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than INAA.AS's 10.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXJ.L has underperformed INAA.AS with an annualized return of 8.40%, while INAA.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 15.35% annualized return.
SPXJ.L
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 16.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
INAA.AS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 9.99%
- 1Y
- 28.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
SPXJ.L vs. INAA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXJ.L iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 8.56% | 11.54% | 7.16% | -1.01% | 4.28% | 5.67% | 1.82% | 15.19% | -5.97% | 13.88% |
INAA.AS iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF | 10.42% | 9.57% | 26.91% | 18.53% | -10.45% | 29.37% | 15.40% | 24.82% | -0.64% | 10.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXJ.L and INAA.AS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2009 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SPXJ.L and INAA.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXJ.L vs. INAA.AS — Risk / Return Rank
SPXJ.L
INAA.AS
SPXJ.L vs. INAA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPXJ.L) and iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (INAA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXJ.L | INAA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.47 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 3.88 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.86 | 13.94 | -7.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXJ.L | INAA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 2.57 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.93 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.94 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.68 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SPXJ.L vs. INAA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -32.61%, smaller than the maximum INAA.AS drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXJ.L and INAA.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXJ.L | INAA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.61% | -35.79% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.39% | -7.19% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -22.11% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.62% | -22.11% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.61% | -27.09% | -5.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -0.20% | -3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -4.95% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 2.01% | +0.44% |
Volatility
SPXJ.L vs. INAA.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPXJ.L) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (INAA.AS) at 3.03%. This indicates that SPXJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INAA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXJ.L | INAA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 3.03% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 7.30% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 10.86% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 14.87% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 16.07% | +1.33% |
SPXJ.L vs. INAA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXJ.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than INAA.AS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXJ.L vs. INAA.AS - Dividend Comparison
SPXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than INAA.AS's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INAA.AS iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF | 0.52% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 0.62% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.21% | 1.18% | 1.25% | 1.39% |
SPXJ.L iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.80% | 2.93% | 3.42% | 3.60% | 3.75% | 2.84% | 2.63% | 3.63% | 3.71% | 3.36% | 3.20% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXJ.L and INAA.AS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INAA.AS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INAA.AS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SPXJ.L.
SPXJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while INAA.AS is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while INAA.AS tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPXJ.L and 0.40% for INAA.AS.
Find the right allocation for SPXJ.L and INAA.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer