INAA.AS vs. CSUS.AS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (INAA.AS) and iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS).

INAA.AS and CSUS.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INAA.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jun 2, 2006. CSUS.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jan 12, 2010. Both INAA.AS and CSUS.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

INAA.AS vs. CSUS.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (INAA.AS) and iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

INAA.AS vs. CSUS.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INAA.AS iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF	-2.87%	4.00%	32.96%	20.94%	-14.85%	37.53%	9.22%	32.33%	-1.61%	6.00%
CSUS.AS iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-3.31%	4.04%	33.96%	22.33%	-15.27%	37.95%	10.18%	32.81%	-0.73%	6.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INAA.AS achieves a -2.87% return, which is significantly higher than CSUS.AS's -3.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with INAA.AS having a 13.04% annualized return and CSUS.AS not far ahead at 13.48%.

INAA.AS

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: -2.87%
• 6M: -0.09%
• 1Y: 10.25%
• 3Y*: 15.71%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 13.04%

CSUS.AS

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -2.91%
• YTD: -3.31%
• 6M: -0.34%
• 1Y: 10.04%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: 11.56%
• 10Y*: 13.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INAA.AS vs. CSUS.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

INAA.AS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUS.AS's 0.33% expense ratio.

INAA.AS

iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF

CSUS.AS

iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Return for Risk

INAA.AS vs. CSUS.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INAA.AS

INAA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 52
INAA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
INAA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
INAA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 31
INAA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
INAA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

CSUS.AS

CSUS.AS Risk / Return Rank: 52
CSUS.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CSUS.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CSUS.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 31
CSUS.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CSUS.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INAA.AS vs. CSUS.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (INAA.AS) and iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INAA.AS	CSUS.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	0.57	+0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	0.88	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.13	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	2.93	+0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.47	10.06	+0.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INAA.AS vs. CSUS.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INAA.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the CSUS.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INAA.AS and CSUS.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INAA.AS	CSUS.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60	0.57	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.73	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.81	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.83	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between INAA.AS and CSUS.AS is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

INAA.AS vs. CSUS.AS - Dividend Comparison

INAA.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while CSUS.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INAA.AS iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF	0.60%	0.59%	0.69%	0.92%	1.08%	0.62%	0.94%	1.10%	1.21%	1.18%	1.25%	1.39%
CSUS.AS iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

INAA.AS vs. CSUS.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INAA.AS drawdown since its inception was -51.35%, which is greater than CSUS.AS's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INAA.AS and CSUS.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	INAA.AS	CSUS.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.35%	-34.08%	-17.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.52%	-13.33%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.43%	-23.49%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.42%	-34.08%	-0.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.30%	-5.40%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.38%	-4.46%	-3.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	2.14%	-0.05%

Volatility

INAA.AS vs. CSUS.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (INAA.AS) and iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSUS.AS) have volatilities of 3.72% and 3.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INAA.AS	CSUS.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	3.68%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.49%	8.65%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.04%	17.40%	-0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.34%	15.51%	-0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.21%	16.27%	-0.06%