PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
INAA.AS vs. VUG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between INAA.AS and VUG is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

INAA.AS vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (INAA.AS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.98%
14.18%
INAA.AS
VUG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

INAA.AS:

2.02

VUG:

1.61

Sortino Ratio

INAA.AS:

2.77

VUG:

2.16

Omega Ratio

INAA.AS:

1.40

VUG:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

INAA.AS:

3.05

VUG:

2.18

Martin Ratio

INAA.AS:

13.38

VUG:

8.29

Ulcer Index

INAA.AS:

1.90%

VUG:

3.41%

Daily Std Dev

INAA.AS:

12.60%

VUG:

17.63%

Max Drawdown

INAA.AS:

-50.95%

VUG:

-50.68%

Current Drawdown

INAA.AS:

-1.17%

VUG:

-0.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INAA.AS achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 3.65% return. Over the past 10 years, INAA.AS has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 12.88%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.66% annualized return.


INAA.AS

YTD

2.37%

1M

0.53%

6M

16.38%

1Y

27.82%

5Y*

14.18%

10Y*

12.88%

VUG

YTD

3.65%

1M

1.68%

6M

14.18%

1Y

29.99%

5Y*

17.45%

10Y*

15.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INAA.AS vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

INAA.AS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.04% expense ratio.


INAA.AS
iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF
Expense ratio chart for INAA.AS: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%
Expense ratio chart for VUG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

INAA.AS vs. VUG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INAA.AS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of INAA.AS is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of INAA.AS is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of INAA.AS is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of INAA.AS is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of INAA.AS is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of INAA.AS is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VUG is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VUG is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VUG is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VUG is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VUG is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VUG is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

INAA.AS vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (INAA.AS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for INAA.AS, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.811.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for INAA.AS, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.502.00
The chart of Omega ratio for INAA.AS, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.331.28
The chart of Calmar ratio for INAA.AS, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.721.98
The chart of Martin ratio for INAA.AS, currently valued at 10.65, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.657.49
INAA.AS
VUG

The current INAA.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INAA.AS and VUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.81
1.49
INAA.AS
VUG

Dividends

INAA.AS vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

INAA.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than VUG's 0.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
INAA.AS
iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF
0.68%0.69%0.92%1.09%0.62%0.94%1.10%1.21%1.18%1.25%1.39%0.89%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.45%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%1.21%

Drawdowns

INAA.AS vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INAA.AS drawdown since its inception was -50.95%, roughly equal to the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INAA.AS and VUG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.41%
-0.51%
INAA.AS
VUG

Volatility

INAA.AS vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI North America UCITS ETF (INAA.AS) is 3.50%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that INAA.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.50%
4.57%
INAA.AS
VUG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab