PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXE vs. PBFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXE vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF (SPXE) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPXE

1D
-0.59%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBFR

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.62%
6M
4.80%
YTD
5.27%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXE vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPXE and PBFR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026

0.70

SPXE vs. PBFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXE
PBFR

Technology

38.6%
38.4%

Financial Services

12.4%
11.0%

Communication Services

10.1%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
10.0%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.6%

Utilities

2.8%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Energy

0.0%
3.2%

Technology

SPXE
38.6%
PBFR
38.4%

Financial Services

SPXE
12.4%
PBFR
11.0%

Communication Services

SPXE
10.1%
PBFR
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXE
9.7%
PBFR
10.0%

Healthcare

SPXE
9.5%
PBFR
8.4%

Industrials

SPXE
8.1%
PBFR
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPXE
4.8%
PBFR
4.6%

Utilities

SPXE
2.8%
PBFR
2.1%

Basic Materials

SPXE
1.9%
PBFR
1.7%

Real Estate

SPXE
1.9%
PBFR
1.8%

Energy

SPXE
0.0%
PBFR
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXE vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PBFR
PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXE vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF (SPXE) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXEPBFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.84

SPXE vs. PBFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXE vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXE drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum PBFR drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXE and PBFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXEPBFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-8.50%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.13%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.46%

-0.61%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

Volatility

SPXE vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXEPBFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.00%

4.29%

+4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.00%

6.77%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.00%

6.77%

+2.23%

SPXE vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXE vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison

SPXE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024
PBFR
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.01%
SPXE
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Energy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXE and PBFR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PBFR.

PBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for SPXE.

SPXE is categorized as S&P 500, while PBFR is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXE and 0.50% for PBFR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXE and PBFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer