PBFR vs. SPYX
PBFR (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF) and SPYX (State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBFR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while SPYX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index. PBFR is actively managed, while SPYX is passively managed. Over the past year, PBFR returned 12.60% vs 26.02% for SPYX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBFR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPYX.
Performance
PBFR vs. SPYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBFR achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly lower than SPYX's 8.96% return.
PBFR
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 12.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 26.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
PBFR vs. SPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 4.45% | 10.44% | 5.53% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 8.96% | 17.87% | 9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBFR and SPYX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PBFR and SPYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
PBFR vs. SPYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBFR
SPYX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PBFR
SPYX
Financial Services
PBFR
SPYX
Communication Services
PBFR
SPYX
Consumer Cyclical
PBFR
SPYX
Healthcare
PBFR
SPYX
Industrials
PBFR
SPYX
Consumer Defensive
PBFR
SPYX
Energy
PBFR
SPYX
Utilities
PBFR
SPYX
Real Estate
PBFR
SPYX
Basic Materials
PBFR
SPYX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBFR vs. SPYX — Risk / Return Rank
PBFR
SPYX
PBFR vs. SPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBFR | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.37 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.49 | 2.66 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.30 | 11.88 | +11.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBFR vs. SPYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBFR drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum SPYX drawdown of -32.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFR and SPYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBFR | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -32.84% | +24.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -9.84% | +7.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.75% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -4.52% | +3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 2.20% | -1.66% |
Volatility
PBFR vs. SPYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) is 1.27%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that PBFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBFR | SPYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 4.78% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.51% | 10.08% | -6.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35% | 12.76% | -8.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.86% | 17.14% | -10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.86% | 18.06% | -11.20% |
PBFR vs. SPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBFR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBFR vs. SPYX - Dividend Comparison
PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SPYX's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 1.08% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.92% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, PBFR and SPYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPYX has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to PBFR (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBFR dropped -8.50% vs SPYX's -32.84%.
On 1-year performance, SPYX leads with 26.02% vs 12.60% for PBFR. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PBFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 26.02% return vs 12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PBFR.
SPYX has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.01% for PBFR.
PBFR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SPYX is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBFR and 0.20% for SPYX.
PBFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBFR and SPYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer