SPXD.L vs. X7PP.L
SPXD.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist) and X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXD.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPXD.L returned 13.92%/yr vs 26.10%/yr for X7PP.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXD.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for X7PP.L.
Performance
SPXD.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPXD.L is traded in USD, while X7PP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the X7PP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXD.L achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly higher than X7PP.L's 4.95% return.
SPXD.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- —
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 41.85%
- 3Y*
- 46.54%
- 5Y*
- 26.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
SPXD.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXD.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist | 10.44% | 17.53% | 25.57% | 26.91% | -18.50% | 29.67% | 17.90% | 13.21% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 4.95% | 101.94% | 24.95% | 29.78% | -5.30% | 27.99% | -16.01% | 10.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXD.L and X7PP.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between SPXD.L and X7PP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXD.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
-
Financial Services
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
Communication Services
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
-
Healthcare
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
-
Industrials
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
-
Energy
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
-
Utilities
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
-
Real Estate
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
-
Basic Materials
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXD.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPXD.L
X7PP.L
SPXD.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXD.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.30 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 2.30 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 7.31 | +7.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXD.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.76 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.99 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.30 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
SPXD.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.98%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -62.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD.L and X7PP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXD.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.98% | -62.74% | +28.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -18.12% | +9.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.29% | -19.96% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.17% | -38.99% | +14.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -3.60% | +3.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -22.28% | +17.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 5.71% | -3.80% |
Volatility
SPXD.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) is 3.10%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that SPXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXD.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 6.89% | -3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.44% | 19.40% | -10.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 23.72% | -12.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 26.33% | -10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 27.41% | -9.71% |
SPXD.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXD.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison
SPXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while X7PP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXD.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist | 1.08% | 1.16% | 1.31% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.87% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXD.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.
SPXD.L is categorized as S&P 500, while X7PP.L is Financials Equities. SPXD.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXD.L and 0.20% for X7PP.L.
Find the right allocation for SPXD.L and X7PP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer