PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXD.L vs. S5SD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXD.L vs. S5SD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPXD.L is traded in USD, while S5SD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the S5SD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXD.L achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly higher than S5SD.L's 8.70% return.


SPXD.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.50%
YTD
10.44%
6M
11.25%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*

S5SD.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.09%
YTD
8.70%
6M
10.26%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXD.L vs. S5SD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPXD.L and S5SD.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.88

The correlation between SPXD.L and S5SD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPXD.L vs. S5SD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXD.L
S5SD.L

Technology

35.6%
38.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
12.0%

Communication Services

11.2%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
4.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
9.3%

Industrials

8.3%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.1%

Energy

3.5%
4.2%

Utilities

2.4%
0.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

SPXD.L
35.6%
S5SD.L
38.6%

Financial Services

SPXD.L
11.8%
S5SD.L
12.0%

Communication Services

SPXD.L
11.2%
S5SD.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXD.L
10.1%
S5SD.L
4.6%

Healthcare

SPXD.L
8.5%
S5SD.L
9.3%

Industrials

SPXD.L
8.3%
S5SD.L
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPXD.L
4.9%
S5SD.L
5.1%

Energy

SPXD.L
3.5%
S5SD.L
4.2%

Utilities

SPXD.L
2.4%
S5SD.L
0.8%

Real Estate

SPXD.L
1.9%
S5SD.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

SPXD.L
1.8%
S5SD.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXD.L vs. S5SD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXD.L
SPXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

S5SD.L
S5SD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXD.L vs. S5SD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXD.LS5SD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.07

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.56

13.34

+1.22

SPXD.L vs. S5SD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXD.L and S5SD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXD.LS5SD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.65

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

3.04

-2.11

Drawdowns

SPXD.L vs. S5SD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.98%, which is greater than S5SD.L's maximum drawdown of -9.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD.L and S5SD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXD.LS5SD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.98%

-9.53%

-24.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-9.53%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.80%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-1.16%

-3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.20%

-0.29%

Volatility

SPXD.L vs. S5SD.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) at 2.88%. This indicates that SPXD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than S5SD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXD.LS5SD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

2.88%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

8.01%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.46%

11.10%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

11.60%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

11.60%

+6.10%

SPXD.L vs. S5SD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than S5SD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPXD.L vs. S5SD.L - Dividend Comparison

SPXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while S5SD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
S5SD.L
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPXD.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist
1.08%1.16%1.31%1.51%1.68%1.30%1.55%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXD.L and S5SD.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for S5SD.L.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXD.L and 0.12% for S5SD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXD.L and S5SD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer