PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPWO vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPWO vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P World ETF (SPWO) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPWO vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPWO
SP Funds S&P World ETF
4.71%26.32%9.25%2.96%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
10.61%38.28%0.36%3.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPWO achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 10.61% return.


SPWO

1D
1.10%
1M
-7.11%
YTD
4.71%
6M
6.19%
1Y
30.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KEMX

1D
1.15%
1M
-8.33%
YTD
10.61%
6M
21.39%
1Y
51.35%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPWO vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPWO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPWO vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPWO
SPWO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPWO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPWO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPWO vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P World ETF (SPWO) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPWOKEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

2.41

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

3.05

-0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.45

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

3.39

-1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.57

13.94

-5.37

SPWO vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPWO and KEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPWOKEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.41

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.51

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between SPWO and KEMX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SPWO vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

SPWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than KEMX's 2.97% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
SPWO
SP Funds S&P World ETF
1.24%1.29%1.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.97%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%

Drawdowns

SPWO vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPWO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPWO and KEMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPWOKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-38.80%

+20.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-15.36%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.53%

-10.66%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-9.02%

+6.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

3.73%

-0.04%

Volatility

SPWO vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SP Funds S&P World ETF (SPWO) is 8.76%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that SPWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPWOKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.76%

11.42%

-2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

16.99%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.32%

21.41%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.41%

17.56%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

20.61%

-2.20%