SPVM vs. VFMO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. SPVM is passively managed, while VFMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPVM returned 11.13%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for VFMO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPVM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.

Performance

SPVM vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 25.84% return.

SPVM

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 9.00%
• 1Y: 28.99%
• 3Y*: 19.25%
• 5Y*: 11.13%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

VFMO

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: 4.69%
• YTD: 25.84%
• 6M: 22.71%
• 1Y: 44.30%
• 3Y*: 27.88%
• 5Y*: 14.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPVM vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF	9.93%	20.47%	15.64%	5.53%	-2.10%	28.86%	-3.18%	29.33%	-8.81%
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	25.84%	17.39%	26.14%	16.25%	-12.84%	19.16%	31.36%	28.22%	-11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SPVM and VFMO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018	0.70

The correlation between SPVM and VFMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPVM vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPVM	VFMO
Financial Services	36.0%	6.5%
Utilities	13.8%	0.2%
Energy	8.6%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	8.7%
Communication Services	6.6%	3.4%
Technology	6.2%	17.5%
Healthcare	6.2%	22.9%
Industrials	4.5%	24.7%
Basic Materials	1.9%	6.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%

Return for Risk

SPVM vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPVM

SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 83
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 85

VFMO

VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPVM vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPVM	VFMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	1.99	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	2.59	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.34	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.43	4.05	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.80	15.07	+1.73

SPVM vs. VFMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the VFMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPVM and VFMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPVM vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and VFMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPVM	VFMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.35%	-36.77%	-8.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.57%	-10.98%	+4.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.66%	-24.40%	+5.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.48%	-25.80%	+6.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-2.31%	+1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-7.73%	+2.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	2.95%	-1.22%

Volatility

SPVM vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) is 3.27%, while Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that SPVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPVM	VFMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	8.33%	-5.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.72%	17.49%	-9.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.64%	22.34%	-10.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.74%	21.90%	-5.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.56%	23.64%	-4.08%

SPVM vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPVM vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison

SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than VFMO's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF	2.02%	2.02%	1.91%	2.45%	2.33%	1.41%	2.11%	2.40%	3.10%	1.68%	2.80%	2.67%
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	0.39%	0.82%	0.72%	0.89%	1.72%	0.81%	0.45%	1.22%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPVM and VFMO in my portfolio?

SPVM and VFMO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPVM or VFMO?

VFMO has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to SPVM (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPVM dropped -45.35% vs VFMO's -36.77%.

Which ETF is better, SPVM or VFMO?

On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 14.02% vs 11.13% for SPVM. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPVM or VFMO?

Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 11.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPVM or VFMO?

VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPVM or VFMO?

SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.39% for VFMO.

What is the main difference between SPVM and VFMO?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.13% for VFMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.