PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPVM vs. SPMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPVM vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPVM

1D
0.31%
1M
2.93%
YTD
10.28%
6M
8.91%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
12.38%

SPMV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPVM vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
10.28%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%8.32%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SPVM and SPMV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.65

The correlation between SPVM and SPMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPVM vs. SPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPVM
SPMV

Financial Services

36.0%
17.8%

Utilities

13.8%
2.8%

Energy

8.6%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
6.6%

Communication Services

6.6%
6.5%

Technology

6.2%
26.9%

Healthcare

6.2%
15.0%

Industrials

4.5%
6.0%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.2%

Financial Services

SPVM
36.0%
SPMV
17.8%

Utilities

SPVM
13.8%
SPMV
2.8%

Energy

SPVM
8.6%
SPMV
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPVM
7.6%
SPMV
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPVM
6.8%
SPMV
6.6%

Communication Services

SPVM
6.6%
SPMV
6.5%

Technology

SPVM
6.2%
SPMV
26.9%

Healthcare

SPVM
6.2%
SPMV
15.0%

Industrials

SPVM
4.5%
SPMV
6.0%

Basic Materials

SPVM
1.9%
SPMV
2.6%

Real Estate

SPVM
1.9%
SPMV
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPVM vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPVM vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPVMSPMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.50

SPVM vs. SPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPVM vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPVMSPMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

Volatility

SPVM vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPVMSPMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

SPVM vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPVM vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison

SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while SPMV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.05%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
2.01%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPVM and SPMV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.05% for SPMV.

SPVM is categorized as Momentum, while SPMV is S&P 500. SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.10% for SPMV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPVM and SPMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer