SPVM vs. QVMT
SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) and QVMT (Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while QVMT is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPVM returned 11.89%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for QVMT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPVM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for QVMT.
Performance
SPVM vs. QVMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than QVMT's 17.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SPVM has underperformed QVMT with an annualized return of 11.89%, while QVMT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.29% annualized return.
SPVM
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
QVMT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 17.16%
- 6M
- 19.76%
- 1Y
- 34.37%
- 3Y*
- 22.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
SPVM vs. QVMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 8.29% | 20.47% | 15.64% | 5.53% | -2.10% | 28.86% | -3.18% | 29.33% | -9.17% | 14.70% |
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 17.16% | 19.08% | 14.40% | 11.71% | -5.61% | 35.27% | -9.98% | 28.86% | -9.51% | 18.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPVM and QVMT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SPVM and QVMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPVM vs. QVMT — Risk / Return Rank
SPVM
QVMT
SPVM vs. QVMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPVM | QVMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 2.77 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 3.96 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 5.52 | -1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 19.63 | -3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPVM | QVMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.77 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.67 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.63 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.59 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
SPVM vs. QVMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, smaller than the maximum QVMT drawdown of -48.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and QVMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPVM | QVMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.35% | -48.05% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -6.25% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.66% | -14.42% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.48% | -21.95% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.35% | -48.05% | +2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -0.46% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -6.34% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.76% | -0.04% |
Volatility
SPVM vs. QVMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) is 2.79%, while Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that SPVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPVM | QVMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 3.13% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.48% | 8.96% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.63% | 12.47% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 17.28% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 21.08% | -1.51% |
SPVM vs. QVMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QVMT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPVM vs. QVMT - Dividend Comparison
SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than QVMT's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 2.06% | 2.42% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 2.70% | 2.23% | 2.48% | 2.37% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 1.91% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPVM and QVMT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVMT has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to SPVM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPVM dropped -45.35% vs QVMT's -48.05%.
On 10-year performance, QVMT leads with 13.29% vs 11.89% for SPVM. On fees, QVMT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QVMT has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVMT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.
QVMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.91% for SPVM.
SPVM is categorized as Momentum, while QVMT is S&P 500. SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while QVMT tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.13% for QVMT.
QVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPVM and QVMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer