SPVM vs. QMOM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) and QMOM (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. SPVM is passively managed, while QMOM is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPVM returned 11.89%/yr vs 13.82%/yr for QMOM. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPVM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QMOM.

Performance

SPVM vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than QMOM's 24.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SPVM has underperformed QMOM with an annualized return of 11.89%, while QMOM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.82% annualized return.

SPVM

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 8.29%
• 6M: 10.61%
• 1Y: 28.06%
• 3Y*: 19.14%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

QMOM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 6.10%
• YTD: 24.65%
• 6M: 26.71%
• 1Y: 31.51%
• 3Y*: 23.22%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 13.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPVM vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF	8.29%	20.47%	15.64%	5.53%	-2.10%	28.86%	-3.18%	29.33%	-9.17%	14.70%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	24.65%	2.36%	30.43%	9.50%	-6.99%	-4.06%	61.94%	28.39%	-11.75%	15.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SPVM and QMOM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.55

The correlation between SPVM and QMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPVM vs. QMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPVM	QMOM
Financial Services	37.0%	1.9%
Utilities	14.2%	2.0%
Energy	8.7%	5.5%
Communication Services	6.6%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	7.4%
Healthcare	6.3%	8.9%
Technology	5.3%	23.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	1.6%
Industrials	4.4%	37.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	9.0%

Return for Risk

SPVM vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPVM

SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 76
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

QMOM

QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 42
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPVM vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPVM	QMOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	1.36	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	1.91	+1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.25	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.29	2.50	+1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.33	9.15	+7.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPVM vs. QMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the QMOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPVM and QMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPVM	QMOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	1.36	+1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.48	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.52	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.52	+0.11

Drawdowns

SPVM vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, which is greater than QMOM's maximum drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and QMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPVM	QMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.35%	-39.13%	-6.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.57%	-12.65%	+6.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.66%	-26.46%	+7.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.48%	-26.82%	+7.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.35%	-39.13%	-6.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.37%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-12.92%	+7.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	3.45%	-1.73%

Volatility

SPVM vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) is 2.79%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that SPVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPVM	QMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	8.32%	-5.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.48%	19.78%	-12.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.63%	23.30%	-11.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.77%	24.19%	-7.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	26.49%	-6.92%

SPVM vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPVM vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison

SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than QMOM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	0.44%	0.54%	1.40%	0.87%	1.59%	0.12%	0.08%	0.01%	0.05%	0.13%	0.34%	0.00%
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF	1.91%	2.02%	1.91%	2.45%	2.33%	1.41%	2.11%	2.40%	3.10%	1.68%	2.80%	2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPVM and QMOM in my portfolio?

SPVM and QMOM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPVM or QMOM?

QMOM has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to SPVM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPVM dropped -45.35% vs QMOM's -39.13%.

Which ETF is better, SPVM or QMOM?

On 10-year performance, QMOM leads with 13.82% vs 11.89% for SPVM. On fees, QMOM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPVM or QMOM?

Over the 10-year period, QMOM has performed better with a 13.82% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPVM or QMOM?

QMOM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPVM or QMOM?

SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.44% for QMOM.

What is the main difference between SPVM and QMOM?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.28% for QMOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.