PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPVM vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPVM vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 7.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPVM having a 11.89% annualized return and IDMO not far ahead at 12.09%.


SPVM

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.16%
YTD
8.29%
6M
10.61%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
11.89%

IDMO

1D
-1.16%
1M
2.20%
YTD
7.74%
6M
12.22%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
25.70%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*
12.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPVM vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
8.29%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%14.70%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
7.74%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SPVM and IDMO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

0.45

The correlation between SPVM and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPVM vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPVM
IDMO

Financial Services

37.0%
42.4%

Utilities

14.2%
8.4%

Energy

8.7%
1.9%

Communication Services

6.6%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
1.4%

Healthcare

6.3%
1.2%

Technology

5.3%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
2.5%

Industrials

4.4%
22.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
10.2%

Financial Services

SPVM
37.0%
IDMO
42.4%

Utilities

SPVM
14.2%
IDMO
8.4%

Energy

SPVM
8.7%
IDMO
1.9%

Communication Services

SPVM
6.6%
IDMO
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPVM
6.3%
IDMO
1.4%

Healthcare

SPVM
6.3%
IDMO
1.2%

Technology

SPVM
5.3%
IDMO
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

SPVM
4.9%
IDMO
2.5%

Industrials

SPVM
4.4%
IDMO
22.6%

Real Estate

SPVM
1.9%
IDMO
2.0%

Basic Materials

SPVM
1.8%
IDMO
10.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPVM vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPVM vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPVMIDMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

1.37

+1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

2.03

+1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

1.88

+2.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.33

7.84

+8.49

SPVM vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPVM and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPVMIDMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.37

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.88

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.67

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.45

+0.17

Drawdowns

SPVM vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPVMIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.35%

-39.38%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-12.31%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

-12.65%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

-27.07%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

-31.34%

-14.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-2.31%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-9.76%

+4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

2.95%

-1.23%

Volatility

SPVM vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) is 2.79%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that SPVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPVMIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

6.43%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

14.91%

-7.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

16.89%

-5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

17.84%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

18.12%

+1.45%

SPVM vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPVM vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than IDMO's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.53%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
1.91%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPVM and IDMO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to SPVM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPVM dropped -45.35% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.09% vs 11.89% for SPVM. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 1.91% for SPVM.

SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.25% for IDMO.

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPVM and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer