SPUU vs. PRN
SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) and PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (200% Daily), while PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPUU returned 24.69%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for PRN. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
SPUU vs. PRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUU achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 40.09% return. Over the past 10 years, SPUU has outperformed PRN with an annualized return of 24.69%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively lower 18.49% annualized return.
SPUU
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 47.93%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 24.69%
PRN
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 40.09%
- 6M
- 38.91%
- 1Y
- 62.65%
- 3Y*
- 34.70%
- 5Y*
- 20.00%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
SPUU vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 15.56% | 26.55% | 44.25% | 47.28% | -38.72% | 61.27% | 21.85% | 66.84% | -14.59% | 44.33% |
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 40.09% | 13.74% | 30.35% | 37.96% | -25.09% | 25.21% | 36.39% | 34.52% | -16.19% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUU and PRN is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SPUU and PRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPUU vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPUU
PRN
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
SPUU
PRN
Financial Services
SPUU
PRN
Communication Services
SPUU
PRN
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPUU
PRN
Healthcare
SPUU
PRN
-
Industrials
SPUU
PRN
Consumer Defensive
SPUU
PRN
-
Energy
SPUU
PRN
Utilities
SPUU
PRN
-
Real Estate
SPUU
PRN
-
Basic Materials
SPUU
PRN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUU vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank
SPUU
PRN
SPUU vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPUU | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 4.33 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.61 | 14.20 | -3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPUU vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUU drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, roughly equal to the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUU and PRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUU | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.35% | -59.88% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.19% | -14.15% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.18% | -30.78% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.59% | -34.84% | -11.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.35% | -36.27% | -23.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.78% | -1.81% | -2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | -10.83% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 4.30% | -0.07% |
Volatility
SPUU vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) is 8.72%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 12.21%. This indicates that SPUU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUU | PRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.72% | 12.21% | -3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.45% | 24.73% | -5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.81% | 30.02% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.59% | 25.33% | +8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.83% | 24.33% | +11.50% |
SPUU vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPUU and PRN have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
SPUU vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison
SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than PRN's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.39% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPUU and PRN have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRN has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to SPUU (8.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUU dropped -59.35% vs PRN's -59.88%.
On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.69% vs 18.49% for PRN. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 8.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.69% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU and PRN have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.12% for PRN.
SPUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PRN is Momentum. SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily), while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco.
PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUU and PRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer