PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUT vs. XRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUT vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUT achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 1.66% return.


SPUT

1D
-0.70%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
4.74%
6M
4.48%
1Y
14.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XRMI

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.20%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUT vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPUT and XRMI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.70

The correlation between SPUT and XRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUT vs. XRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUT
XRMI

Technology

39.0%
39.5%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.3%

Financial Services

10.3%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.5%

Industrials

8.2%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.6%

Energy

3.2%
3.1%

Utilities

2.1%
2.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

SPUT
39.0%
XRMI
39.5%

Communication Services

SPUT
10.9%
XRMI
10.3%

Financial Services

SPUT
10.3%
XRMI
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPUT
10.1%
XRMI
9.5%

Healthcare

SPUT
8.4%
XRMI
8.5%

Industrials

SPUT
8.2%
XRMI
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPUT
4.4%
XRMI
4.6%

Energy

SPUT
3.2%
XRMI
3.1%

Utilities

SPUT
2.1%
XRMI
2.7%

Basic Materials

SPUT
1.8%
XRMI
1.7%

Real Estate

SPUT
1.7%
XRMI
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUT vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUT
SPUT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUT vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPUTXRMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

1.81

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.69

7.28

+7.41

SPUT vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUT and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPUT vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUT drawdown since its inception was -10.55%, smaller than the maximum XRMI drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUT and XRMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUTXRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-15.31%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-5.02%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-0.52%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.94%

-5.87%

+4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.24%

-0.25%

Volatility

SPUT vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 1.71%. This indicates that SPUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUTXRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

1.71%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.18%

4.44%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.76%

5.52%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.35%

6.91%

+4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.35%

6.91%

+4.44%

SPUT vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUT vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

SPUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, less than XRMI's 12.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
SPUT
Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF
5.15%4.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.73%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUT and XRMI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPUT has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to XRMI (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUT dropped -10.55% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

On 1-year performance, SPUT leads with 14.58% vs 9.03% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPUT has performed better with a 14.58% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPUT.

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.73%, compared with 5.15% for SPUT.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPUT and 0.60% for XRMI.

SPUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUT and XRMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer