SPUS vs. UPRO
SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) and UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) are both exchange-traded funds - SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while UPRO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPUS returned 15.42%/yr vs 20.84%/yr for UPRO. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPUS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for UPRO.
Performance
SPUS vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 24.61% return.
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 1Y
- 27.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 15.42%
- 10Y*
- —
UPRO
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 19.67%
- YTD
- 24.61%
- 1Y
- 54.64%
- 3Y*
- 43.89%
- 5Y*
- 20.84%
- 10Y*
- 28.60%
SPUS vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 12.06% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.95% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 24.61% | 31.88% | 63.57% | 68.53% | -56.84% | 98.64% | 10.09% | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUS and UPRO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SPUS and UPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPUS vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPUS
UPRO
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
-
Technology
SPUS
UPRO
Healthcare
SPUS
UPRO
Consumer Cyclical
SPUS
UPRO
Industrials
SPUS
UPRO
Communication Services
SPUS
UPRO
Basic Materials
SPUS
UPRO
Energy
SPUS
UPRO
Consumer Defensive
SPUS
UPRO
Real Estate
SPUS
UPRO
Utilities
SPUS
UPRO
Financial Services
SPUS
-
UPRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUS vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank
SPUS
UPRO
SPUS vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPUS | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 2.05 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 8.08 | +1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPUS vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and UPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUS | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -76.82% | +46.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -26.78% | +16.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.82% | -48.87% | +26.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.06% | -63.94% | +35.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.07% | -4.60% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -14.36% | +8.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 6.78% | -3.89% |
Volatility
SPUS vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) is 4.88%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that SPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUS | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 10.61% | -5.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 30.01% | -17.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 37.59% | -22.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 50.67% | -31.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 53.71% | -32.44% |
SPUS vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUS vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison
SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than UPRO's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SPUS and UPRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UPRO has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to SPUS (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs UPRO's -76.82%.
On 5-year performance, UPRO leads with 20.84% vs 15.42% for SPUS. On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 20.84% return vs 15.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.
UPRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.54% for SPUS.
SPUS is categorized as S&P 500, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while UPRO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 0.89% for UPRO.
SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUS and UPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer