PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUS vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUS vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 96.27% return.


SPUS

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.49%
YTD
15.82%
6M
15.21%
1Y
40.24%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*

HIBL

1D
-2.25%
1M
38.56%
YTD
96.27%
6M
98.56%
1Y
279.13%
3Y*
62.03%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUS vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.82%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%0.81%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
96.27%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUS and HIBL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019

0.76

The correlation between SPUS and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUS vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUS
HIBL

Technology

57.3%
45.8%

Healthcare

11.1%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
12.9%

Industrials

7.0%
11.7%

Communication Services

6.4%
3.7%

Energy

3.3%
2.2%

Basic Materials

3.0%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
0.6%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Utilities

0.3%
3.2%

Financial Services

-

12.5%

Technology

SPUS
57.3%
HIBL
45.8%

Healthcare

SPUS
11.1%
HIBL
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPUS
7.3%
HIBL
12.9%

Industrials

SPUS
7.0%
HIBL
11.7%

Communication Services

SPUS
6.4%
HIBL
3.7%

Energy

SPUS
3.3%
HIBL
2.2%

Basic Materials

SPUS
3.0%
HIBL
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPUS
2.9%
HIBL
0.6%

Real Estate

SPUS
1.4%
HIBL

-

Utilities

SPUS
0.3%
HIBL
3.2%

Financial Services

SPUS

-

HIBL
12.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUS vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUS vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPUSHIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.47

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

8.96

-5.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.32

32.84

-16.52

SPUS vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 4.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUS and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPUSHIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

4.26

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.14

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.24

+0.67

Drawdowns

SPUS vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUSHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-88.27%

+57.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-31.39%

+20.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.82%

-69.66%

+46.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.06%

-81.58%

+53.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-2.25%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-44.20%

+37.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

8.55%

-6.08%

Volatility

SPUS vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) is 4.00%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 21.25%. This indicates that SPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUSHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

21.25%

-17.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

50.46%

-39.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

66.16%

-52.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

82.16%

-62.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

91.89%

-70.61%

SPUS vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUS vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than HIBL's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.18%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUS and HIBL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (21.25%) compared to SPUS (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs 11.57% for HIBL. On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.52% for SPUS.

SPUS is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUS and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer