SPUS vs. HIBL
SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) and HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while HIBL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPUS returned 17.46%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for HIBL. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPUS charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for HIBL.
Performance
SPUS vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 96.27% return.
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 40.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- —
HIBL
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 38.56%
- YTD
- 96.27%
- 6M
- 98.56%
- 1Y
- 279.13%
- 3Y*
- 62.03%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SPUS vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 15.82% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.81% |
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 96.27% | 60.38% | -0.40% | 81.02% | -68.24% | 129.14% | -24.96% | 4.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUS and HIBL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SPUS and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPUS vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPUS
HIBL
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Financial Services
-
Technology
SPUS
HIBL
Healthcare
SPUS
HIBL
Consumer Cyclical
SPUS
HIBL
Industrials
SPUS
HIBL
Communication Services
SPUS
HIBL
Energy
SPUS
HIBL
Basic Materials
SPUS
HIBL
Consumer Defensive
SPUS
HIBL
Real Estate
SPUS
HIBL
-
Utilities
SPUS
HIBL
Financial Services
SPUS
-
HIBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUS vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank
SPUS
HIBL
SPUS vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPUS | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.47 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 8.96 | -5.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.32 | 32.84 | -16.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPUS | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 4.26 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.14 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.24 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
SPUS vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and HIBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUS | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -88.27% | +57.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -31.39% | +20.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.82% | -69.66% | +46.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.06% | -81.58% | +53.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -2.25% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -44.20% | +37.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 8.55% | -6.08% |
Volatility
SPUS vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) is 4.00%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 21.25%. This indicates that SPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUS | HIBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 21.25% | -17.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.84% | 50.46% | -39.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.16% | 66.16% | -52.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 82.16% | -62.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 91.89% | -70.61% |
SPUS vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUS vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison
SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than HIBL's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares | 1.18% | 2.43% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.52% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPUS and HIBL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIBL has higher volatility (21.25%) compared to SPUS (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs HIBL's -88.27%.
On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs 11.57% for HIBL. On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 11.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.
HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.52% for SPUS.
SPUS is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 1.12% for HIBL.
HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUS and HIBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer