SPUS vs. AMAPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) and AMAPX (Amana Participation Fund) are both funds - SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while AMAPX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Amana. Over the past 5 years, SPUS returned 17.46%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for AMAPX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPUS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for AMAPX.

Performance

SPUS vs. AMAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than AMAPX's 0.26% return.

SPUS

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 9.49%
• YTD: 15.82%
• 6M: 15.21%
• 1Y: 40.24%
• 3Y*: 24.89%
• 5Y*: 17.46%
• 10Y*: —

AMAPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: 3.76%
• 5Y*: 1.34%
• 10Y*: 2.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUS vs. AMAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF	15.82%	19.77%	26.49%	34.24%	-22.76%	35.92%	25.68%	0.81%
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund	0.26%	5.98%	3.77%	2.09%	-5.27%	0.49%	5.35%	0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUS and AMAPX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019	0.12

The correlation between SPUS and AMAPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (5 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SPUS vs. AMAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUS

SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 81
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

AMAPX

AMAPX Risk / Return Rank: 45
AMAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AMAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AMAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AMAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AMAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUS vs. AMAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPUS	AMAPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	1.90	+0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	3.13	+0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.59	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	1.66	+2.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.32	5.37	+10.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPUS vs. AMAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the AMAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUS and AMAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPUS	AMAPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	1.90	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.62	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	1.11	-0.19

Drawdowns

SPUS vs. AMAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, which is greater than AMAPX's maximum drawdown of -7.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and AMAPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPUS	AMAPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.80%	-7.75%	-23.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.66%	-2.51%	-8.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.82%	-2.64%	-20.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.06%	-7.75%	-20.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-7.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-0.60%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-1.56%	-4.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	0.77%	+1.70%

Volatility

SPUS vs. AMAPX - Volatility Comparison

SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) at 1.50%. This indicates that SPUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPUS	AMAPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	1.50%	+2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.84%	1.98%	+8.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.16%	2.19%	+11.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.23%	2.19%	+17.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.28%	2.01%	+19.27%

SPUS vs. AMAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAPX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPUS vs. AMAPX - Dividend Comparison

SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than AMAPX's 3.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund	3.66%	3.52%	3.15%	2.25%	1.30%	1.55%	1.95%	2.45%	2.62%	2.14%	2.14%
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF	0.52%	0.60%	0.70%	0.87%	1.21%	1.15%	1.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPUS and AMAPX in my portfolio?

SPUS and AMAPX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPUS or AMAPX?

SPUS has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to AMAPX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs AMAPX's -7.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.