SPUC vs. TOLZ
SPUC (Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPUC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. SPUC is actively managed, while TOLZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPUC returned 13.13%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for TOLZ. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPUC charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
SPUC vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUC achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 12.09% return.
SPUC
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 25.30%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 16.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
SPUC vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 7.04% | 22.64% | 25.37% | 27.50% | -24.76% | 33.71% | 10.62% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.09% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 20.47% | 4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUC and TOLZ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPUC and TOLZ has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPUC vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPUC
TOLZ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPUC
TOLZ
Financial Services
SPUC
TOLZ
Communication Services
SPUC
TOLZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPUC
TOLZ
Healthcare
SPUC
TOLZ
-
Industrials
SPUC
TOLZ
Consumer Defensive
SPUC
TOLZ
Energy
SPUC
TOLZ
Utilities
SPUC
TOLZ
Real Estate
SPUC
TOLZ
Basic Materials
SPUC
TOLZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUC vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
SPUC
TOLZ
SPUC vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPUC | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 3.17 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 9.16 | -1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPUC vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUC drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUC and TOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUC | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.20% | -39.33% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -5.18% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.17% | -11.94% | -16.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.20% | -21.85% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -2.45% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -6.61% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 1.79% | +1.65% |
Volatility
SPUC vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.24%. This indicates that SPUC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUC | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 3.24% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 8.30% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.05% | 10.41% | +6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 13.98% | +8.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 16.23% | +5.22% |
SPUC vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUC has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUC vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
SPUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.39%, more than TOLZ's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 9.39% | 7.70% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.53% | 2.00% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.63% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPUC and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPUC has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to TOLZ (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUC dropped -29.20% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.
On 5-year performance, SPUC leads with 13.13% vs 8.72% for TOLZ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUC has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SPUC.
SPUC has the higher dividend yield at 9.39%, compared with 3.63% for TOLZ.
SPUC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SPUC and 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUC and TOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer