SPUC vs. SCHB
SPUC (Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SPUC is actively managed, while SCHB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPUC returned 12.89%/yr vs 12.21%/yr for SCHB. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPUC charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
SPUC vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUC achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 11.43% return.
SPUC
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 7.28%
- YTD
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- 21.71%
- 3Y*
- 21.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 21.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
SPUC vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 9.94% | 22.64% | 25.37% | 27.50% | -24.76% | 33.71% | 10.62% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 11.43% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 12.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUC and SCHB is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SPUC and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPUC vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPUC
SCHB
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPUC
SCHB
Financial Services
SPUC
SCHB
Communication Services
SPUC
SCHB
Consumer Cyclical
SPUC
SCHB
Healthcare
SPUC
SCHB
Industrials
SPUC
SCHB
Consumer Defensive
SPUC
SCHB
Energy
SPUC
SCHB
Utilities
SPUC
SCHB
Real Estate
SPUC
SCHB
Basic Materials
SPUC
SCHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUC vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
SPUC
SCHB
SPUC vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPUC | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 2.46 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.31 | 10.73 | -4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPUC vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUC drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUC and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUC | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.20% | -35.27% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -8.91% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.17% | -19.34% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.20% | -25.41% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.59% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.35% | -4.10% | -4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 2.04% | +1.41% |
Volatility
SPUC vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) have volatilities of 3.87% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUC | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 3.72% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 10.15% | +0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 12.84% | +3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 17.36% | +4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 18.31% | +3.06% |
SPUC vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUC has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUC vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
SPUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, more than SCHB's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 10.00% | 7.70% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.53% | 2.00% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SPUC and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPUC has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to SCHB (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUC dropped -29.20% vs SCHB's -35.27%.
On 5-year performance, SPUC leads with 12.89% vs 12.21% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUC has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SPUC.
SPUC has the higher dividend yield at 10.00%, compared with 1.04% for SCHB.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SPUC and 0.03% for SCHB.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUC and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer