SPUC vs. ITOT
SPUC (Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SPUC is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPUC returned 13.74%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for ITOT. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPUC charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
SPUC vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUC achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.78% return.
SPUC
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 29.51%
- 3Y*
- 24.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 28.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
SPUC vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 9.72% | 22.64% | 25.37% | 27.50% | -24.76% | 33.71% | 9.53% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.78% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUC and ITOT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SPUC and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPUC vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPUC
ITOT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPUC
ITOT
Financial Services
SPUC
ITOT
Communication Services
SPUC
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
SPUC
ITOT
Healthcare
SPUC
ITOT
Industrials
SPUC
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
SPUC
ITOT
Energy
SPUC
ITOT
Utilities
SPUC
ITOT
Real Estate
SPUC
ITOT
Basic Materials
SPUC
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUC vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
SPUC
ITOT
SPUC vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPUC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 3.25 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 14.92 | -6.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPUC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 2.37 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.74 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.57 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
SPUC vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUC drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUC and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.20% | -55.20% | +26.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -8.90% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.17% | -19.44% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.20% | -25.36% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.25% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.48% | -6.97% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 1.94% | +1.48% |
Volatility
SPUC vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) is 2.64%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that SPUC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUC | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 2.94% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.87% | 9.14% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 12.19% | +4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 17.35% | +4.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 18.26% | +3.20% |
SPUC vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUC has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUC vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
SPUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.16%, more than ITOT's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 9.16% | 7.70% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.53% | 2.00% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SPUC and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITOT has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to SPUC (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUC dropped -29.20% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 5-year performance, SPUC leads with 13.74% vs 12.80% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPUC has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUC has performed better with a 13.74% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SPUC.
SPUC has the higher dividend yield at 9.16%, compared with 0.97% for ITOT.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SPUC and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUC and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer