SPTI vs. BNDD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPTI (SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF) and BNDD (Quadratic Deflation ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. SPTI is passively managed, while BNDD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPTI returned 3.44%/yr vs -3.91%/yr for BNDD. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPTI charges 0.06%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BNDD.

Performance

SPTI vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (SPTI) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPTI achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 4.32% return.

SPTI

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: -0.41%
• 6M: -0.57%
• 1Y: 3.61%
• 3Y*: 3.44%
• 5Y*: 0.04%
• 10Y*: 1.33%

BNDD

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 4.32%
• 6M: 2.24%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: -3.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPTI vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPTI SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF	-0.41%	7.46%	1.32%	4.24%	-10.65%	-1.48%
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF	4.32%	-8.17%	-6.65%	4.02%	-17.48%	5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SPTI and BNDD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021	0.41

Return for Risk

SPTI vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTI

SPTI Risk / Return Rank: 28
SPTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SPTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
SPTI Omega Ratio Rank: 27
SPTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SPTI Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BNDD

BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 14
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPTI vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (SPTI) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPTI	BNDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	0.32	+0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	0.52	+1.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.06	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	0.56	+0.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.90	1.20	+2.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPTI vs. BNDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the BNDD Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPTI and BNDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPTI	BNDD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	0.32	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	-0.33	+0.88

Drawdowns

SPTI vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPTI drawdown since its inception was -16.12%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPTI and BNDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPTI	BNDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.12%	-30.87%	+14.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.80%	-6.09%	+3.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.35%	-20.75%	+16.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-26.51%	+24.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.92%	-19.34%	+16.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	2.83%	-1.90%

Volatility

SPTI vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (SPTI) is 1.05%, while Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that SPTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPTI	BNDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	2.21%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.33%	8.11%	-5.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.41%	10.59%	-7.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.35%	13.38%	-8.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.37%	13.38%	-9.01%

SPTI vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPTI has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPTI vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison

SPTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than BNDD's 3.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF	3.61%	3.82%	3.85%	4.30%	43.17%	1.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTI SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF	3.86%	3.79%	3.77%	2.99%	1.45%	0.53%	0.75%	2.02%	1.97%	1.46%	1.23%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPTI and BNDD in my portfolio?

SPTI and BNDD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPTI or BNDD?

BNDD has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to SPTI (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPTI dropped -16.12% vs BNDD's -30.87%.

Which ETF is better, SPTI or BNDD?

On 3-year performance, SPTI leads with 3.44% vs -3.91% for BNDD. On fees, SPTI is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SPTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPTI or BNDD?

Over the 3-year period, SPTI has performed better with a 3.44% return vs -3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPTI or BNDD?

SPTI is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for BNDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPTI or BNDD?

SPTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 3.61% for BNDD.

What is the main difference between SPTI and BNDD?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SPTI and 1.02% for BNDD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.