SPT vs. ZETA
SPT (Sprout Social, Inc.) and ZETA (Zeta Global Holdings Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, SPT returned -44.93%/yr vs 37.46%/yr for ZETA. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SPT vs. ZETA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPT achieves a -35.76% return, which is significantly lower than ZETA's 14.35% return.
SPT
- 1D
- -8.82%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- -35.76%
- 6M
- -30.38%
- 1Y
- -67.25%
- 3Y*
- -44.93%
- 5Y*
- -36.49%
- 10Y*
- —
ZETA
- 1D
- -7.84%
- 1M
- 26.06%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 26.47%
- 1Y
- 76.69%
- 3Y*
- 37.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPT vs. ZETA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPT Sprout Social, Inc. | -35.76% | -63.30% | -50.02% | 8.82% | -37.74% | 17.29% |
ZETA Zeta Global Holdings Corp. | 14.35% | 13.12% | 103.97% | 7.96% | -2.97% | -5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPT and ZETA is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.45 |
The correlation between SPT and ZETA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
SPT:
-$0.65
ZETA:
-$0.14
SPT:
0.91
ZETA:
2.68
SPT:
$469.76M
ZETA:
$1.44B
SPT:
$363.91M
ZETA:
$881.70M
SPT:
-$26.14M
ZETA:
$50.09M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPT vs. ZETA — Risk / Return Rank
SPT
ZETA
SPT vs. ZETA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPT | ZETA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.23 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 1.91 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 3.91 | -5.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPT | ZETA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.16 | 1.05 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | 0.30 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
SPT vs. ZETA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPT drawdown since its inception was -96.54%, which is greater than ZETA's maximum drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPT and ZETA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPT | ZETA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.54% | -70.01% | -26.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.78% | -40.37% | -37.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.46% | -70.01% | -22.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.98% | -36.66% | -58.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.25% | -34.03% | -19.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.65% | 19.66% | +33.99% |
Volatility
SPT vs. ZETA - Volatility Comparison
Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT) has a higher volatility of 25.99% compared to Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) at 24.19%. This indicates that SPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZETA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPT | ZETA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.99% | 24.19% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.02% | 48.30% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.13% | 73.49% | -15.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.63% | 72.21% | -4.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.78% | 72.21% | -2.43% |
Dividends
SPT vs. ZETA - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPT nor ZETA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SPT vs. ZETA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprout Social, Inc. and Zeta Global Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SPT vs. ZETA - Profitability Comparison
SPT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprout Social, Inc. reported a gross profit of 93.51M and revenue of 121.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.0%.
ZETA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 233.86M and revenue of 396.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.
SPT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprout Social, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.85M and revenue of 121.50M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.8%.
ZETA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -18.84M and revenue of 396.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.8%.
SPT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprout Social, Inc. reported a net income of -6.34M and revenue of 121.50M, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.
ZETA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -13.25M and revenue of 396.30M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPT and ZETA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPT has higher volatility (25.99%) compared to ZETA (24.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPT dropped -96.54% vs ZETA's -70.01%.
ZETA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPT and ZETA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer