PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPT vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPT vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPT achieves a -26.53% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 14.07% return.


SPT

1D
-1.19%
1M
16.29%
6M
-22.69%
YTD
-26.53%
1Y
-56.07%
3Y*
-44.87%
5Y*
-37.95%
10Y*

CGDV

1D
0.73%
1M
2.26%
6M
11.97%
YTD
14.07%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
23.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPT vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SPT
Sprout Social, Inc.
-26.53%-63.30%-50.02%8.82%5.55%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
14.07%25.50%20.10%28.81%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SPT and CGDV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between SPT and CGDV has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPT vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPT
SPT Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPT Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPT vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPTCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.35

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

2.39

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

11.10

-12.23

SPT vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPT and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPT vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPT drawdown since its inception was -96.54%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPT and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPTCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.54%

-21.82%

-74.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.20%

-9.75%

-64.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.46%

-14.28%

-78.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.26%

0.00%

-94.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.91%

-3.55%

-50.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.57%

2.10%

+50.47%

Volatility

SPT vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT) has a higher volatility of 17.52% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 4.36%. This indicates that SPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPTCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.52%

4.36%

+13.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.07%

10.03%

+39.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.36%

12.32%

+48.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.79%

15.52%

+52.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.68%

15.52%

+54.16%

Dividends

SPT vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

SPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.18%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%
SPT
Sprout Social, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPT and CGDV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPT has higher volatility (17.52%) compared to CGDV (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPT dropped -96.54% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPT and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer