PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPSB vs. PIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPSB vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPSB achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 28.27% return.


SPSB

1D
0.17%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.14%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
2.62%

PIT

1D
0.40%
1M
-9.92%
YTD
28.27%
6M
29.77%
1Y
39.38%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPSB vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SPSB
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.97%5.86%5.25%5.60%-0.20%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
28.27%21.63%6.77%-4.54%1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPSB and PIT is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022

-0.04

The correlation between SPSB and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPSB vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPSB
SPSB Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SPSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPSB vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPSBPITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.33

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

2.87

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.63

11.34

+11.29

SPSB vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPSB Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPSB and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPSB vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPSB drawdown since its inception was -11.75%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -13.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPSB and PIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPSBPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-13.74%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.87%

-13.74%

+12.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.87%

-13.74%

+12.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-13.40%

+13.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-4.06%

+3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

3.48%

-3.29%

Volatility

SPSB vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPSB) is 0.48%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that SPSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPSBPITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

4.96%

-4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.00%

19.37%

-18.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37%

21.60%

-20.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

17.50%

-15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.06%

17.50%

-14.44%

SPSB vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPSB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPSB vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

SPSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than PIT's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
6.95%8.92%3.59%6.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPSB
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.40%4.55%4.85%4.05%1.92%1.19%1.94%2.77%2.36%1.94%1.65%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPSB and PIT have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIT has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to SPSB (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPSB dropped -11.75% vs PIT's -13.74%.

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 18.65% vs 5.35% for SPSB. On fees, SPSB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 5.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 4.40% for SPSB.

SPSB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPSB and 0.55% for PIT.

SPSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPSB and PIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer