SPQB.DE vs. 2B7C.DE
SPQB.DE (Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF) and 2B7C.DE (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPQB.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 5% Buffer Protect, while 2B7C.DE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPQB.DE returned 10.70%/yr vs 19.96%/yr for 2B7C.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPQB.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 2B7C.DE.
Performance
SPQB.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPQB.DE achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7C.DE's 20.34% return.
SPQB.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2B7C.DE
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 20.34%
- 6M
- 20.66%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 14.65%
- 10Y*
- —
SPQB.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPQB.DE Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF | 7.95% | -0.77% | 20.64% | 4.26% |
2B7C.DE iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 20.34% | 6.93% | 23.74% | 9.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPQB.DE and 2B7C.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2023 | 0.55 |
The correlation between SPQB.DE and 2B7C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPQB.DE vs. 2B7C.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SPQB.DE
2B7C.DE
SPQB.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPQB.DE | 2B7C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.04 | 3.38 | +1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.54 | 11.04 | +3.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPQB.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPQB.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.15%, smaller than the maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown of -41.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPQB.DE and 2B7C.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPQB.DE | 2B7C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.15% | -41.31% | +25.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -8.89% | +5.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.15% | -22.67% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -1.09% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -5.82% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 2.73% | -1.66% |
Volatility
SPQB.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE) is 1.45%, while iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that SPQB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPQB.DE | 2B7C.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | 4.64% | -3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.34% | 11.46% | -7.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.44% | 14.84% | -7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.88% | 16.83% | -6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.88% | 20.23% | -10.35% |
SPQB.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPQB.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B7C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPQB.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPQB.DE nor 2B7C.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPQB.DE and 2B7C.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 2B7C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2B7C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPQB.DE.
SPQB.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while 2B7C.DE is Industrials Equities. SPQB.DE tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 5% Buffer Protect, while 2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPQB.DE and 0.15% for 2B7C.DE.
Find the right allocation for SPQB.DE and 2B7C.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer